The Efficient-Market Hypothesis and the Financial Crisis

Write an essay between 800 and 1200 words (excluding references), consisting of three tasks:

  1. Read and summarize the following article:
    • Malkiel, B. G. (2012). The Efficient-Market Hypothesis and the Financial Crisis. In A. S. Blinder, A.
    W. Loh, and R. M. Solow (Eds.), Rethinking the Financial Crisis, Russell Sage Foundation, New
    York.
  2. Explain the efficient market hypothesis (EMH), behavioural finance, and their relevance in explaining asset
    price bubbles.
  3. In the end of the article, Malkiel concluded that“EMH and behavioural finance should not be considered as
    competitive models”.
    Discuss how he reached this view, and provide your view on this statement.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

The efficient market hypothesis (EMH) is a theory that states that asset prices reflect all available information. This means that it is impossible to consistently beat the market by buying undervalued assets or selling overvalued assets.

The EMH is based on the following assumptions:

  • All investors have access to the same information.
  • All investors are rational and act in their own best interests.
  • There are no transaction costs or frictions.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

If these assumptions are met, the EMH implies that asset prices will always be at their fair value. This means that there is no opportunity for investors to generate alpha (excess returns over the market).

The EMH is often divided into three forms: weak-form, semi-strong-form, and strong-form.

  • Weak-form efficiency implies that asset prices reflect all historical information. This means that it is impossible to consistently beat the market using technical analysis, which is the analysis of past price and trading volume data.
  • Semi-strong-form efficiency implies that asset prices reflect all publicly available information. This means that it is impossible to consistently beat the market using fundamental analysis, which is the analysis of a company’s financial statements and other publicly available information.
  • Strong-form efficiency implies that asset prices reflect all information, both public and private. This means that it is impossible to consistently beat the market using any type of information.

Behavioral Finance

Behavioral finance is a field of study that examines how human psychology affects financial decision-making. Behavioral finance scholars have identified a number of cognitive biases and heuristics that can lead investors to make irrational decisions.

Some common cognitive biases that can affect investor behavior include:

  • Anchoring bias: The tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information we receive when making a decision.
  • Confirmation bias: The tendency to seek out and interpret information in a way that confirms our existing beliefs.
  • Loss aversion: The tendency to feel the pain of losses more acutely than the pleasure of gains.
  • Overconfidence bias: The tendency to overestimate our own abilities and knowledge.

Relevance of the EMH and Behavioral Finance in Explaining Asset Prices

The EMH and behavioral finance are both relevant in explaining asset prices. The EMH provides a theoretical framework for understanding how asset prices should behave in an efficient market. Behavioral finance helps to explain why asset prices may deviate from their theoretical values in the real world.

For example, behavioral finance can explain why investors may be willing to pay more for stocks that have been rising in price (anchoring bias) or why investors may be more likely to sell stocks that have fallen in price (loss aversion). Behavioral finance can also explain why investors may be more likely to invest in stocks that are familiar to them (confirmation bias) or why investors may be overconfident in their ability to pick winning stocks (overconfidence bias).

Examples of Behavioral Finance in Action

Here are a few examples of how behavioral finance can explain asset prices in the real world:

  • The dot-com bubble: In the late 1990s, there was a surge in investment in technology companies. Many of these companies had little or no earnings, but their stock prices were soaring. This was likely due to a number of behavioral factors, including anchoring bias (investors were relying too heavily on the rising stock prices) and confirmation bias (investors were seeking out and interpreting information in a way that confirmed their belief that tech stocks were a good investment).
  • The housing bubble: In the early 2000s, there was a surge in home prices. This was likely due to a number of behavioral factors, including overconfidence bias (investors were overestimating their ability to pick winning investments) and anchoring bias (investors were relying too heavily on the rising home prices).
  • The flash crash of 2010: On May 6, 2010, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by over 1,000 points in a matter of minutes. This crash was likely due to a number of behavioral factors, including herd behavior (investors were following the lead of other investors who were selling their stocks) and panic selling (investors were selling their stocks at any price in order to avoid further losses).

Conclusion

The EMH and behavioral finance are both relevant in explaining asset prices. The EMH provides a theoretical framework for understanding how asset prices should behave in an efficient market. Behavioral finance helps to explain why asset prices may deviate from their theoretical values in the real world.

Investors should be aware of the potential impact of behavioral biases on their investment decisions. By understanding how behavioral biases can affect their decision-making, investors can make better investment decisions.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer