Working Group Scenario Worksheet

Review the following scenario:
Imagine that individuals within the community action group are meeting to share the social issue they have chosen and the ethical perspective they might use as they consider solutions. Some tensions have popped up in the action group. Your community action small group consists of five people. Two members of the group are highly engaged and seem to work well together. One member of the group, however, is controlling and wants to push their ideas and perspectives on other members of the group. Another member of the group is going through some difficult personal challenges and is not able to participate as much as he would like. Finally, one male team member keeps interrupting a female team member when she shares ideas with the rest of the group.
Complete Parts 1 and 2 below.
Part 1
Identify how someone with each ethical perspective listed in the first column would approach the group and individual members in this scenario by answering the questions in the remaining columns.
Ethical Perspective Based on this ethical perspective, what are the needs of the group in the scenario? How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the controlling group member? How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the group member dealing with personal challenges? How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the male group member that keeps interrupting the female team member?
Deontology (Ethics of Duty)
Rights Ethics
Ethical Egoism
Utilitarianism

Part 2
Write a 350- to 700-word analysis of the ways the ethical perspectives presented can impact real-world scenarios, particularly in the workplace:
• Explain how the different ethical perspectives work in real-world scenarios.
• Briefly describe a situation that has happened in your life or that you are familiar with where you experienced or were told about these ethical perspectives.
o In this situation, explain how the needs of the individual can be balanced with the needs of the larger group.
• Explain the benefits, as well as any downfalls, of these ethical perspectives.

Full Answer Section

      Part 2 In addition to the ethical perspectives listed above, there are a number of other factors that someone might consider when approaching this scenario. These factors might include the group's goals, the group's dynamics, the individual members' needs, and the cultural context. For example, if the group's goal is to create a plan to address a specific social issue, then the person might focus on ensuring that everyone's voices are heard and that the group is able to reach a consensus. If the group's dynamics are characterized by conflict and disagreement, then the person might focus on finding ways to build trust and cooperation. If the individual members' needs are different, then the person might focus on finding ways to accommodate those needs. And if the cultural context is one where there are different expectations for how men and women should interact, then the person might focus on being mindful of those expectations. Ultimately, the best way to approach this scenario is to consider all of the factors involved and to choose an approach that is ethical and effective. tuneshare Google it more_vert

Sample Answer

   
Based on this ethical perspective, what are the needs of the group in the scenario? How would someone with this ethical perspective perceive and address the controlling group member?
The deontological perspective focuses on duty and obligation. Someone with this perspective would believe that the group needs to follow certain rules and procedures in order to function effectively. They would also believe that the controlling group member is violating these rules and procedures, and they would need to be addressed. The person with this perspective would also believe that the group member dealing with personal challenges needs to be supported and encouraged to participate as much as possible. They would also believe that the male group member that keeps interrupting the female team member is violating her right to be heard, and they would need to be addressed.
The utilitarian perspective focuses on maximizing happiness and minimizing suffering. Someone with this perspective would believe that the group needs to find a way to work together effectively in order to achieve their goals. They would also believe that the controlling group member is not being helpful, and they would need to be addressed in a way that minimizes conflict and maximizes cooperation. The person with this perspective would also believe that the group member dealing with personal challenges needs to be supported and encouraged to participate as much as possible, but they would also need to be mindful of the impact their participation is having on the group. They would also believe that the male group member that keeps interrupting the female team member is not being helpful, and they would need to be addressed in a way that minimizes conflict and maximizes cooperation.
The virtue ethics perspective focuses on the development of good character. Someone with this perspective would believe that the group needs to develop the virtues of cooperation, communication, and respect. They would also believe that the controlling group member is not demonstrating these virtues, and they would need to be encouraged to develop them. The person with this perspective would also believe that the group member dealing with personal challenges needs to be supported and encouraged to develop the virtues of resilience and perseverance. They would also believe that the male group member that keeps interrupting the female team member is not demonstrating the virtue of respect, and they would need to be encouraged to develop it.
The care ethics perspective focuses on the importance of relationships and caring for others. Someone with this perspective would believe that the group needs to create a safe and supportive environment where everyone feels valued and respected. They would also believe that the controlling group member is not creating a safe and supportive environment, and they would need to be addressed in a way that is respectful and caring. The person with this perspective would also believe that the group member dealing with personal challenges needs to be supported and cared for, and they would need to be mindful of the impact their participation is having on the group. They would also believe that the male group member that keeps interrupting the female team member is not being respectful, and they would need to be addressed in a way that is respectful and caring.