Watson and Arneson’s arguments.

1.Compare Watson and Arneson’s arguments. Are they consistently applying consequentialist or deontological
moral reasoning? Given what you read in this and previous modules, which moral principle should we apply in
this case?
Give real-world examples and defend your answer writing 1 or 2 short paragraphs per question.
Use the following readings below:
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/ethics-in-human-experimentation-in-science-based-medicine/
https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html
https://ori.hhs.gov/content/chapter-3-The-Protection-of-Human-Subjects-introduction
https://ori.hhs.gov/chapter-3-The-Protection-of-Human-Subjects-nuremberg-code-directives-humanexperimentation
https://ori.hhs.gov/content/chapter-3-The-Protection-of-Human-Subjects-IRBs
https://ori.hhs.gov/content/chapter-3-The-Protection-of-Human-Subjects-Continuing-responsibility
https://ori.hhs.gov/content/chapter-3-The-Protection-of-Human-Subjects-Ethical-issues