Was the United States justified in dropping atomic bombs during World War 2?

Full Answer Section

    Another argument in favor of the use of nuclear weapons is that it would deter Japan from continuing the war. However, it is important to note that Japan was already looking for ways to end the war before the atomic bombs were dropped. Additionally, the use of nuclear weapons caused widespread devastation and suffering in Japan, and it is likely that it would have had the same effect on any other country that was attacked with nuclear weapons. The main arguments against the use of nuclear weapons are the moral and ethical implications. Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction that can cause indiscriminate death and destruction. Their use is a violation of international law and human rights. Additionally, the use of nuclear weapons could lead to a nuclear winter, which would have devastating consequences for all life on Earth. In conclusion, I believe that the United States was not justified in dropping atomic bombs during World War 2. The use of nuclear weapons was a moral and ethical crime that caused widespread death and destruction. It also created a dangerous precedent and increased the risk of future nuclear war.  

Sample Answer

     

The decision to use atomic bombs was a complex one, and there are many arguments for and against the use of nuclear weapons. However, in my opinion, the arguments against the use of nuclear weapons outweigh the arguments in favor.

One of the main arguments in favor of the use of nuclear weapons is that it would shorten the war and save lives. However, it is estimated that the atomic bombs killed between 129,000 and 226,000 people in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and many more died from radiation sickness and injuries in the years that followed. Additionally, the use of nuclear weapons created a dangerous precedent and increased the risk of future nuclear war.