There have been leaders who created visions for evil purposes.
Our textbook emphasizes creating a vision for social good. However, throughout history there have been leaders who created visions for evil purposes. How does the visioning process differ for those who want to influence others for evil ends? Are the characteristics of the vision the same? How does the articulation of the vision differ? How does the implementation differ?
Sample Answer
The visioning process for those who want to influence others for evil ends is similar to the visioning process for those who want to influence others for good ends. However, there are some key differences.
One difference is the motivation of the visionaries. Those who want to influence others for evil ends are motivated by a desire for power, control, or domination. They may also be motivated by hatred, prejudice, or a desire for revenge. Those who want to influence others for good ends are motivated by a desire to help others, make the world a better place, or achieve a common goal.
Another difference is the content of the vision. The vision of those who want to influence others for evil ends is often about creating a world that is divided, hierarchical, and oppressive. They may envision a world where certain groups of people are superior to others, or where there is a constant struggle for power. The vision of those who want to influence others for good ends is often about creating a world that is united, equal, and just. They may envision a world where everyone has the opportunity to reach their full potential, and where everyone is treated with respect and dignity.