Discuss the potential costs of attacks (such as 9/11 or the Boston Marathon and even smaller attacks; notwithstanding the human losses) when the attacks are successful in the Homeland AND
(3) In a third paragraph, compare and discuss the comparison of the U.S. costs to the "limited costs" incurred by terrorists to carry out differing attacks.
(4) In your fourth paragraph, also discuss if you have a better understanding of, or appreciation for, the level of funding the U.S. has been committing to Homeland Security, Homeland Defense, and Intelligence AND has your position on the appropriateness of the U.S. expenditures
Full Answer Section
While the need for robust security measures is undeniable, the question of whether the current level of spending is appropriate and effective remains a subject of ongoing debate. It is crucial to continually evaluate the effectiveness of these expenditures and ensure that resources are allocated efficiently and effectively to mitigate threats and protect national security.
Sample Answer
3) The stark contrast lies in the relatively "limited costs" incurred by terrorists to carry out attacks. Terrorist organizations often utilize low-cost methods, such as explosives, improvised weapons, and cyberattacks, to inflict significant damage. This stark asymmetry highlights the challenge of effectively countering terrorism while minimizing the societal and economic costs of such efforts.
(4) This review significantly increased my understanding of the level of funding the U.S. commits to Homeland Security, Homeland Defense, and Intelligence. Prior to this analysis, I was aware of the significant expenditures, but I had not fully grasped the sheer scale of these investments.