Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Paper Formatting
Double or single-spaced
1-inch margin
12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
300 words per page
No Lateness!
Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Our Guarantees
Free Unlimited revisions
Guaranteed Privacy
Money Return guarantee
Plagiarism Free Writing
The origin of Mount Royal remains a matter of some debate.
According to Tourisme Montreal, what is the myth surrounding this prominent feature of the city? [2 marks]
Other sources suggest that the Monteregian Hills have an origin that is analogous to the Hawaiian islands and seamounts. a. Identify the island/seamount chain that the Monteregian Hills (including Mount Royal) are deemed to be a part of. [1 mark] b. Briefly described the Plate Tectonic setting required for the island/seamount chain origin. [2 marks] c. Based on the island/seamount interpretation for the origin of the Monteregian Hills, describe plate motion and ages in relative terms. [4 marks]
Does Eby’s grain-size data, for this feature’s igneous rocks, encourage or discourage belief in this ‘volcanic myth’? Explain by paying special attention to the style of volcanism required to account for a volcano (Assignment 2, Question 1(a)) or a island/seamount chain (Assignment 2, Question 1(b)). [3 marks]
Distinguish between seamount and island. [1 mark]
Using Google Maps (or a similar mapping capability) in satellite view, locate the New England Seamounts in the Atlantic Ocean: a. Estimate the distance between the Bear and Nashville seamounts. [1 marks] b. Using this view, or NOAA’s map view here, estimate the trend of these seamounts as a relative compass direction. [1 marks]
Referring to Eby’s Figure 1: a. Estimate the trend of the Monteregian Hills as a relative compass direction. Report any challenges you encounter. [2 marks] b. Estimate the trend of the White Mountains as a relative compass direction. [1 mark]
Using the NOAA case study here, for these Atlantic Ocean Basin mountains and seamounts state the approximate: a. Ages for each of the Monteregian Hills, the New England Seamounts, the Corner Rise Seamounts, and the Great Meteor Group. [2 marks] b. Water depth for a mountain or seamount in each of the Monteregian Hills, the New England Seamounts, the Corner Rise Seamounts, and the Great Meteor Group. (Note: An annotated version of the relevant graph from the NOAA study MUST be included as a part of your submission.) [2 marks, -5 marks if annotated graph is absent.]
Are the trend and age estimates for the Monteregian Hills, the New England Seamounts, the Corner Rise Seamounts, and the Great Meteor Group, consistent with a hotspot-based narrative? Discuss. [4 marks]
Provide a geologically oriented sketch that accounts for a stationary hotspot and moving plates. Based on your sketch, and the above narrative, what must be the case for the location of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge relative to the hotspot? [4 marks]
Eby claims that a failed aulacogen allows for an interpretation that is more consistent with the geological/geochronological evidence. a. Define this term and provide a sketch of its Plate Tectonic context. [4 marks] b. In stating “… note the approximately 120° angle between the [Monteregian Hills] and younger [White Mountain] plutons …” draws our attention to the spatial appearance of these intrusions. By annotating Eby’s Figure 1, are you able to confirm the angular relationship between these series of plutons? [3 marks] c. Is this interpretation consistent with the Tourisme Montreal myth? Explain. [3 marks]