The Non-consequential Theory

Description

  1. Moral Decisions in Act Non-consequential Theory
    The act Non-consequential theory allows one greater freedom in making moral decisions than other theories because it leaves moral decisions completely up to each individual’s own feelings. How free do you think individuals should be in their moral decision-making? Do you think this theory appeals to you and to what extent.
  2. Role of Emotions in a Moral System
    Analyze whether emotions or feelings play an important role in a moral system. How do they relate to morality?
  3. Divine Command Theory
    To what extend do you believe that Jews, Christians, and Muslims use the “Divine Command Theory” approach rather than egoism or act or rule utilitarianism as a basis for their ethical systems?
  4. Duty and Morality
    How much importance do you think duty ought to have in relation to morality?
  5. Consistency in a Moral Code
    Rule Non-consequential theories stress consistency in their moral systems and codes, whereas the act Non-consequential theory seems to imply variety and inconsistency. Is consistency in a moral system or code, or for a person important?
  6. Moral Absolutes
    The rule Non-consequential theories essentially state that there are certain moral absolutes that should never be violated (e.g., rules against killing, mutilating, stealing, and breaking promises). To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea? Are there certain do’s and don’ts to which human beings should always adhere and what are they? Why should they adhere to these moral principles, and what are the reasons behind this view of yours?
  7. Ranking Morals in Order of Importance
    Do you think it is important to rank moral rules in order of importance (e.g., Ross’s Prima Facie Duties)? How will you rank your own ethical rules or those of any other system of which you are aware?
  8. Consequences in Moral Systems
    Assess whether consideration of consequences can be safely eliminated from any moral system? Why do you think so?
  9. Human Beings as Teleological
    Do you believe that human beings are teleological, which means they have a purpose? Explain why or why not.
  10. Human Beings as Virtuous
    Do you know anyone whom you think is an “ideal, virtuous person”? Describe that person’s character and explain why you think about him or her in that manner.
  11. Moderation in Virtues
    Do you believe that moderation is always a virtue? Should people always strive to reach the mean between two extremes? Why, or why not?
  12. The Ideal Virtuous Person
    Do you believe people are born virtuous or are groomed to be like that? If you believe they are born that way, what evidence or proof can you cite in support of your belief? If people are taught to be virtuous, what methods should be used to make them so?
  13. The List of Virtues
    Think of someone whom you think is an “ideal, virtuous person.” Describe that person’s character and explain why you think about him or her in that manner.