Suicide Risk Assessment And Safety Planning
After reviewing the Emotional Fire Safety Plan from the Suicide Prevention and Management Webinar, discuss your thoughts. What do you think of the “On Fire” and “In a Fire” categories? Could you see yourself using this tool?
What do you think of the Stanley Brown Safety Plan? Could you use this with numerous populations and settings?
Which do you think is more user-friendly—the PHQ-9 or C-SSRS? Explain your thinking.
What about this week’s content did you find to be of most interest?
Sample Answer
Emotional Fire Safety Plan:
- On Fire: The “On Fire” category focuses on identifying early warning signs and triggers. I find this very valuable for individuals to recognize when their emotions are escalating and they might be more vulnerable to suicidal thoughts. It empowers them to take proactive steps before reaching a crisis point.
- In a Fire: This section provides coping mechanisms and support resources. The use of metaphors like “throwing water” on negative thoughts is engaging and easily relatable, making it user-friendly. However, concerns might arise if individuals interpret these actions literally instead of figuratively.
- Overall: I find the Emotional Fire Safety Plan to be a valuable tool, particularly for its engaging language and focus on self-awareness. However, it might require