Suicide Risk

While the procedures used to conduct suicide risk assessments vary by agency/school, there are important foundational processes and tools one must thoroughly understand. As someone on the front line and in direct contact with clients/students, counselors need to be able to understand and implement suicide risk assessment in an instant, without hesitation. Due to this, it is critical that counselors are aware of risk factors, suicide risk assessments tools, interventions, and safety planning on the individual level.

Present a background of suicide, including:
Identify and explain key terms associated with suicide intervention, such as suicidal ideation, suicide plan, suicide attempt, etc. Briefly address terms no longer used in the field.
Identify risk factors for suicidal behavior, with a focus on cultural aspects presented and previous mental health diagnoses.
Identify prevalence/statistics within various populations (LGBTI, males, military, American Indians/Alaska Natives, etc.).
Report on suicide risk screeners and assessment tools.
Identify the difference between a suicide risk screening and assessment.
Present several instruments used (IS PATH WARM, SAFE-T, PHQ-9, etc.).
Application to case.
Choose either the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) or Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) from the Suicide Prevention and Management Webinar and apply it to the case of Anna in Chapter 7 (page 151), reporting on what her ratings on either scale would be.
Identify the following for Anna (or David): risk factors, protective factors, lethality, plan, and mandated reporting issues.
Create a safety plan for Anna (or David) using the Emotional Fire Safety Plan (Suicide Prevention and Management Webinar) and Stanley and Brown Safety Plan (6 steps). Check your work with Appendix 7.1.
Those with a school counseling focus may use the case of David in Chapter 1 (page 12), making the assumption that he did not die by suicide and applying what is in Chapters 1 and 7 pertaining to social media. Not as much information is presented and will have to be constructed by the learner if this case is chosen.
We know the racial/cultural, gender identity, and sexual identity of Anna. Address how/if that information may change your approaches. Because we do not have this information pertaining to David, those working with this case will need to make some assumptions and apply those in your analysis.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

Suicide Risk Assessment for Anna (Chapter 7):

Background:

Before analyzing Anna’s case, let’s establish some key terms and concepts:

  • Suicidal ideation: Thoughts about ending one’s life.
  • Suicide plan: A specific blueprint for attempting suicide, including method, time, and location.
  • Suicide attempt: An act of self-harm with the intent to die.
  • Lethality: The likelihood of a suicide attempt being successful.

Full Answer Section

 

 

  • Risk factors:Characteristics or experiences that increase the risk of suicide.
  • Protective factors:Characteristics or experiences that decrease the risk of suicide.
  • Safety plan:A collaborative strategy to manage suicidal thoughts and urges.

Anna’s Case:

Unfortunately, information on Anna’s racial/cultural, gender identity, and sexual identity is missing. While addressing how these factors might influence an approach requires specific details, we can analyze her situation using available information.

Risk Factors:

  • Mental health diagnoses:Chapter 7 mentions Anna seeking help for depression and anxiety. These are significant risk factors.
  • Recent life stressors:She experienced a major life change (leaving a relationship) and feels alone, isolated, and hopeless.
  • Previous suicide attempts:Though unclear, Chapter 7 emphasizes her past suicidal thoughts and self-harm, indicating a prior vulnerability.

Protective Factors:

  • Seeking help:Her willingness to seek professional help demonstrates proactive coping.
  • Social support:She has friends who care and a therapist, offering potential support systems.
  • Open communication:Expressing suicidal thoughts to her therapist suggests a level of self-awareness and willingness to address the issue.

Lethality:

With limited information, determining the specific lethality is difficult. However, the presence of a plan (unspecified nature), recent stressors, and previous attempts raises concerns.

Assessment Tools:

Given the available tools in the webinar, we can consider:

  • PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9):This self-report screener measures depression severity and could indicate Anna’s current mental state.
  • C-SSRS (Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale):This clinician-administered tool assesses specific suicide thoughts, plans, and intent, providing a more detailed picture.

Applying either tool requires Anna’s participation and clinical expertise. However, considering the risk factors and available information, using both tools would be advisable.

Safety Plan:

Here’s a safety plan incorporating both the Emotional Fire Safety Plan and Stanley and Brown’s approach, tailored to Anna’s situation:

  1. Warning Signs:Recognize triggers like loneliness, overwhelming emotions, and relationship concerns.
  2. Calming Strategies:Practice deep breathing, meditation, mindfulness exercises, or listen to calming music.
  3. Reach Out:Call a trusted friend, therapist, or suicide hotline (listed in the plan).
  4. Limit Access:Remove means of self-harm from the environment when feeling overwhelmed.
  5. Engage in Activities:Engage in hobbies, exercise, or spend time with loved ones.
  6. Professional Help:Schedule therapy appointments and attend support groups.

Cultural Considerations:

While information on Anna’s background is missing, it’s crucial to consider cultural factors in suicide assessment and intervention. Different cultures have varying beliefs and attitudes towards suicide, impacting help-seeking behaviors and support systems. If her background information becomes available, tailoring the safety plan and approach becomes crucial.

Conclusion:

Anna’s case highlights the importance of comprehensive suicide risk assessment, incorporating screening tools, clinical judgment, and cultural sensitivity. The suggested safety plan provides a starting point, but customization based on individual needs and cultural considerations is essential.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer