Sociology of culture
- How is Becker’s article “Art Worlds” relevant to the material we have covered so far?
- How is “Framing Fat” (the book summarized in the assigned blog post) relevant to the material we have covered so far?
- Must all cultural objects be meaningful? Why or why not? Think of and list examples of US cultural objects that seem saturated with meaning and others that seem meaningless. Why are some so exalted and others so ignored? How can both be part of the same culture? Is this distinction of meaningful and meaningless akin to Durkheim’s distinction betweent the sacred and the profane? Why or why not?
- Select a subculture within US culture, perhaps one that you are a part of such as a religious group, ethnic group, social club, etc. Discuss how this subculture erects and maintains its symbolic boundaries. [HINT: Reading the artilcle on symbolic boundaries posted above will help you better answer this question.]
Sample Answer
1. Becker’s “Art Worlds” and Cultural Material
Becker’s “Art Worlds” is highly relevant to the material we’ve covered, particularly in its exploration of the social and institutional factors that shape cultural production and consumption. The concept of “art worlds” highlights the interconnectedness of artists, critics, collectors, and other stakeholders who contribute to the creation and circulation of cultural objects. This aligns with our discussions on the social construction of meaning and the role of institutions in shaping cultural values and practices.