sexual harassment, what do you believe to be the primary moral wrong committed by sexual harassment? Do you believe that there is a single moral wrong that undergirds sexual harassment, or are there several? Be sure to defend your interpretation of the moral foundations of objections against sexual harassment against other interpretations.

Assestment

Order Description

Unless otherwise indicated, there is a 200 word minimum response required.
•Credible reference materials, including your course textbook(s), may be used to complete the assessment.
?If you have questions regarding the credibility of your reference, please contact your professor.
•APA Information
?In-text and reference citations are required for all written responses

Question 1
1.
After reading the articles in the Chapter 4 discussing sexual harassment, what do you believe to be the primary moral wrong committed by sexual harassment?  Do you

believe that there is a single moral wrong that undergirds sexual harassment, or are there several?  Be sure to defend your interpretation of the moral foundations of

objections against sexual harassment against other interpretations.

Question 3
1.
Freedom of speech and expression are fundamental human rights that are protected under the U.S. Constitution.  Commonly, defenses of these rights are grounded in

appeals to autonomy (in order to act autonomously, we must have the freedom to express ourselves).  Thus, restrictions on our freedom of expression correlate to

restrictions on our autonomy.  However, several authors cited within Chapter 4 recognize that sexual harassment can have a detrimental effect on autonomy.  On the

surface, there seems to be a tension between appeals to autonomy in defense of freedom of speech and expression and appeals to autonomy in order to justify

restrictions on freedom of speech and expression, which may result in sexual harassment.  Do you believe that there is a conflict between these two positions?  How may

such a conflict be balanced?
Answer

Question 4
1.
John R. Boatright recognizes a potential strategy regarding workplace hazards in which acceptance of hazardous work conditions may be balanced by negotiated increases

in compensation.  Do you believe that all workplace hazards should be up for negotiations over compensation, or should there be a minimum baseline to which, even if

employees would be willing to assume the risks for increased pay, they should not be allowed?  Defend your position.
Answer

Course Textbook
Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N. E., & Arnold, D. G. (2009). Ethical theory and business (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

find the cost of your paper