Response to an article

This is mini essay response to the article.
https://www.writing.upenn.edu/library/Baudelaire_Painter-of-Modern-Life_1863.pdf
please support your assertions with direct quotes from the text. will be graded on context as well as on presentation.
Please think about the following questions. Baudelaire treats the obscure artist Constantin Guys as the type of artist flaneur. What are the defining characteristics of this type? How is Guys the embodiment of the "genius" as Baudelaire defines it? How does Baudelaire define modernity? Is this a phenomenon he claims is new in human history or is it a recurring one? Why is it vital for the artist (or critics) to attend to the details, the ephemera, of their own times? How does he characterize the "dandy"? How does this rare modern type differ from the flaneur ? Why does he refer to an artist as an "external convalescent?" Why does he criticize Ingres? Do you agree with Baudelaire?