Protecting U.S. Skies and Airports: Threats, Issues, and Measures of Protection Effectiveness
A few years ago, … I traveled to Israel … through Ben Gurion, as pristine, clean, empty, and beautiful an airport as I’ve ever been in. There were no lines anywhere and sightlines everywhere … . Indeed, before you step into the airport, you’ve already been scrutinized by Israeli security agents monitoring all approaching automobiles and entry doors. (Lowrey, 2010, para. 1)
The Israeli method of surveillance is not as intrusive as at U.S. airports, yet more thorough in screening passengers. Rather than removing shoes, belts, and other articles, passengers are politely asked a series of questions out of earshot from others. Travelers feel protected from potential terrorist strikes because of the high quality of surveillance.
Sample Answer
The passage you provided offers an interesting perspective on Israeli airport security compared to other experiences, particularly in the US. Here are some key points and potential areas for further discussion:
Observations:
- Efficiency and aesthetics: The author describes Ben Gurion airport as “pristine, clean, empty, and beautiful” with no lines, contrasting it with other experiences.
- Non-intrusive surveillance: The author highlights that Israeli security methods rely less on physical checks like removing shoes and belts, and more on questioning and monitoring.
- Passenger perception: The author feels protected due to the perceived thoroughness of the security measures.