Preparing a speech on the benefits of a new drug

Imagine that you are preparing a speech on the benefits of a new drug, and you find a direct quotation that clearly establishes your argument. Unfortunately, you soon realize that the source of your quotation is actually lobbyist who works for the pharmaceutical company that manufactures the drug. You really want to use this quotation as your attention-getter, but you realize that the source is clearly biased. Which of the following options do you think is the most ethical? Why?

  1. Disregard the quotation and find another way to start your speech.
  2. Use the quotation, but acknowledge that the source comes from a paid lobbyist of the pharmaceutical company who manufactures the drug.
  3. Use the quotation and just give the name of the source. If your audience is interested in your topic, they’ll do their own research and make informed decisions for themselves.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

The most ethical option is to disclose the source of the quotation and to explain why you are still using it. This will allow the audience to evaluate the quotation for themselves and to decide how much weight to give it.

Here is an example of how you could disclose the source of the quotation and explain why you are still using it:

“In my research on the new drug [drug name], I came across a direct quotation that clearly establishes my argument. The quotation is from [lobbyist’s name], a lobbyist for the pharmaceutical company that manufactures [drug name]. I know that [lobbyist’s name] is biased, but I believe that the quotation is still relevant and worth sharing. Here is the quotation:

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

I am using this quotation because it provides a concise and clear summary of the benefits of [drug name]. However, I want to be transparent with you about the source of the quotation. I encourage you to do your own research on [drug name] and to form your own opinion on its benefits and risks.”

By disclosing the source of the quotation and explaining why you are still using it, you are demonstrating your commitment to honesty and transparency. You are also allowing the audience to make informed decisions about the information that you are presenting.

Here are some other options that you could consider, but they are less ethical than the option described above:

  • Use the quotation without disclosing the source. This is unethical because it is a form of plagiarism.
  • Disclose the source of the quotation but downplay the bias. This is unethical because it is a form of deception.
  • Use the quotation and acknowledge the bias, but argue that the quotation is still credible. This is less ethical than the first option because it does not give the audience the full information they need to evaluate the quotation for themselves.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to use the quotation is up to you. However, it is important to weigh the pros and cons of each option and to make the decision that you believe is most ethical.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer