Philosophical puzzle

Think about a famous philosophical puzzle called New-comb's problem.
As | mentioned during class yesterday, it is part of the next segment of the course addressing critiques of critical inking. Specifically, New comb's problem illustrates how critical thinking can be indeterminate. That is, as you'll see, there appear to be equally powerful arguments for opposite ways of responding to the problem. The problem is set out in the following article:
https: /Awww.theguardian.com/science/alexs-adventures-in-number land/201 6/now/28/new combs-problem-divides-philosophers-which-side-are-you-on There is also a nice description of it in this YouTube video (although you only need to watch through the 2:40 mark):
https: /Awww. youtube. com/watch?v=2KxJ6eETY 9bDA.
After reading the article and watching the video, please provide a % to 1 page write up explaining how you would respond to Newcomb’s problem —
would you choose both boxes or just one box, and why?