Normative Ethics

Consequentialism and Kantianism propose different ideas for how to determine what is morally right and
morally wrong. Kantians propose the principle of universalizability and the principle of humanity whereas
utilitarians propose the principle of utility. First, clearly explain these principles. Second, come up with a
particular scenario where the different normative ethical principles would yield conflicting advice about what
ought to be done in that scenario. That is, your scenario should be one in which, e.g., the principle of utility
says that you should do X in situation A, the principle of humanity says that you should not do X (but some
other thing, Y) in situation A, and the principle of universalizability says you should do Z in situation A. Finally,
say which principle you think gives the best advice for what ought to be done in your scenario and explain why
you think this