Full Answer Section

• Disengagement and Frustration:Memorizing formulas and procedures can be tedious and uninspiring. Students may become frustrated if they don’t understand the “why” behind the math.
• Limited Problem-Solving Ability:Rote memorization doesn’t equip students with the critical thinking and problem-solving skills needed in real-world situations.

Benefits of a Curriculum Movement:

• Conceptual Understanding:A focus on understanding mathematical concepts fosters deeper learning. Students can connect the “what” and “how” of math, making it more meaningful.
• Improved Problem-Solving Skills:By learning to think critically and break down problems, students can develop strategies to solve a wider range of mathematical challenges.
• Increased Engagement and Confidence:When students understand the “why” behind the math, they become more engaged and confident in their abilities.

Substantiating the Need for Change:

The module notes likely provided evidence supporting a curriculum movement by highlighting the shortcomings of rote memorization and the benefits of a more conceptual approach. This could include:

• Research Studies:Studies might show that students who learn math through understanding outperform those who rely solely on memorization.
• Real-World Examples:Demonstrating how strong math skills are applied in careers and everyday life can show the relevance of conceptual understanding.
• Improved Test Scores:If a curriculum shift leads to better performance on standardized tests that assess problem-solving and critical thinking, it strengthens the case for a change.

Overall:

While rote memorization can have a place in learning basic facts, a curriculum that emphasizes understanding empowers students to become more confident and capable mathematicians.