Psychologists, and particularly developmental psychologists, are critically concerned about the "so-called" nature-nurture controversy. That is, they seek to determine the influences of our nature (eg., heredity, genes, biology, maturation) and our nurture (eg., learning, experiences, nutrition) on our behavior and mental processes.
Question: Does the study by Gibson and Walk appear to offer more support for either nature or nurture in the perceptual development of the infant, or does it show more support for the complex interaction between both nature and nurture? Explain your response with evidence from the research and the textbook (do not use any other sources).