Presentation Rubric
| Evaluation Categories |
|
| ||||
| I. Organization | Strong 15 | Proficient 12 | Satisfactory 10 | Weak 7 | Unacceptable 0 | Score |
|
| Format of presentation is appropriate. enhances the quality of the presentation, and is visually appealing. The information is presented in a logical sequence and has a nice flow. Sources are appropriately cited throughout the presentation. | Format of presentation is appropriate and is visually appealing. The information is presented in a logical sequence. Sources are appropriately cited throughout the presentation. | Format of presentation is appropriate but lacks visual appeal. The information is presented in a fairly logical sequence. Sources are cited throughout the presentation with less than a few errors. | Format of presentation isn’t completely appropriate for the task. The information isn’t presented in a logical sequence. Sources are not consistently cited throughout the presentation and have errors. | Format of presentation isn’t appropriate. The information isn’t presented in a logical sequence. Sources are not cited. |
|
| II. Content | Strong 45 | Proficient 39 | Satisfactory 35 | Weak 29 | Unacceptable 0 | Score |
|
| Introduction is attention-grabbing and succinctly summarizes the topic and establishes a clear framework for the rest of the presentation. Accurate information is represented and is relevant to the topic. There is a clear conclusion to the presentation that summarizes main ideas. | Introduction summarizes the topic and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation. Accurate information is represented and is relevant to the topic. There is a clear conclusion to the presentation. | Introduction briefly summarizes the topic but doesn’t elaborate on a framework for the rest of the presentation. Accurate information is represented and is typically relevant to the topic. There is a conclusion to the presentation. | Introduction somewhat summarizes the topic but doesn’t elaborate on a framework for the rest of the presentation. Mostly accurate information is represented but some information is not relevant to the topic. There is not a clear conclusion to the presentation. | Introduction doesn’t summarize the topic clearly and doesn’t elaborate on a framework for the rest of the presentation. Information is not accurate and lacks relevancy to the topic. There is no conclusion to the presentation. |
|
| III. Presentation | Strong 40 | Proficient 34 | Satisfactory 30 | Weak 27 | Unacceptable 0 | Score |
|
| Speaker maintains eye contact and is engaged and animated during the presentation. The speaker has a clear and audible voice and maintains a good pace. The length of the presentation meets requirements. | Speaker maintains eye contact and is relatively animated during the presentation. The speaker has a clear and audible voice and maintains a good pace. The length of the presentation meets requirements. | Speaker has infrequent eye contact with the audience and has moments of animation and engagement, although not consistent. The speaker has a relatively clear and audible voice and maintains a good pace. The length of the presentation meets requirements. | Speaker lacks eye contact with the audience. Speaker doesn’t seem engaged and isn’t animated during the presentation. The speaker has a relatively clear and audible voice but doesn’t keep a good pace. The length of the presentation does not meet requirements. | Speaker lacks eye contact with the audience. Speaker isn’t engaged and isn’t animated during the presentation. The speaker does not have a clear and audible voice and doesn’t keep a good pace. The length of the presentation does not meet requirements. |
|
| Additional Comments: | Your total score ( Total Rubric: 100 points ) |
|