Linking child development research with policy and practice
Order Description
Linking child development research with policy and practice
The aim of this assessment task is to develop your ability to differentiate quality of research
studies within a specific child development issue. This will involve comparing 5 peer-reviewed
research articles in terms of research quality.
Locate 5 articles published in the last ten years (2006 - 2016) and not included in the unit
outline that report on research conducted into the following area:
? Culture and child development
1. Introduce these five articles in the following narrative structure: from lowest to highest
research quality. Quality is rather broad. There are several ways to evaluate quality in research:
a. Methodology. For instance, larger samples are better than smaller samples or case studies
because large samples are less vulnerable to anomalous findings (e.g., one child that behaves
strangely in a data set affects the entire cohort because it is a small cohort). Experimental
research is the gold standard (e.g., randomly assigning participants to a specific condition)
because we can infer causality. Longitudinal studies are superior to cross-sectional studies
because we can track change over time and observe whether one variable (e.g., age) predicts another
variable (e.g., vocabulary).
Poorly designed studies that leave open too many questions can also affect quality. Therefore, even
though experimental research may be superior to a cross-sectional survey study, a poorly designed
experimental study is certainly of poorer quality to a cross-sectional survey study. Design issues
in a study (e.g., they said they tested a child?s memory, but it could also be X, Y, or Z) can also
affect quality.
b. Innovation. Research studies that answered new and important questions. A research study that
developed a new method to ask an important lingering question is also innovative.
c. Usefulness. The study tells us something important about children that we can then apply in the
real world to help children develop optimally, or, can help shape policy so that funding can be
used efficiently. These two examples are by no means exhaustive. Usefulness of a study can be
subjective so it is important you
make strong case for why one study is more useful than another.
A study does not have to meet every item to be considered ?quality? research. However, a study that
meets more of these items would be considered a higher quality study than another study that only
meets one or none of these items.
2. Describe these five research studies that examine your selected topic. Your essay should explain
why each study has been placed in this order. One way of doing this would be to discuss the
strength and weakness of each study, and then comparing it to the preceding study to explain why
Study B is better than Study A.
? In your response you should describe the study in sufficient detail to explain to the reader what
the researchers did. So, we will need the aims of the studies, and a broad overview of participants
and methods utilised by the researchers in the studies. However, we do not need intricate details
that do not add to the essay narrative. For instance, it may be important that you tell us that 200
Asian children were included in the study because it is an innovation ? no studies have explored
Asian children to date on such a large scale. However, we may not need to know that the Peabody
Vocabulary Test was included because this detail does not add to the narrative, and was only
included to ensure no differences between groups on account of language development.
? Explaining your ranking and integrating it within your essay narrative structure is important as
it counts for 30 marks in the essay (Criteria 3 and 5). Integration means building your rationale
for ranking within the text, and they usually involve critical analysis that involve comparing
studies:
e.g., ?While Smart and Sassy (1984) were the first to explore gender differences in risky play
using an observational and qualitative study, Brilliant and Idea (1992) were the first to explore
this issue systematically in a quantitative study where they coded children?s play within a
controlled research session. Specifically, they ?. . That study was superior to
Smart and Sassy (1984) because?.?
? You do not need to compare your last study to every study before it. A good narrative is not
systematic (e.g., compare study 3 to study 2 and 1, then compare study 5 to all preceding study).
All you need to show is that the next study is even better. If you have written your essay well,
with a strong coherent narrative, then you only need to make a few statements to point out the
relative strength of a study and why it is the best in the series.
3. Discuss the implications for policy and/or practice from the best study (last in your series)
for practitioners working with young children and their families. Implications refer to how you
would use research findings to shape the way you practice within the early childhood context.
Specific implications will earn you more marks than broad implications.
AVOID USING THESE ARTICLES:
o Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Lee, Y., Allhusen, V. D., Kim, M. S., & McDowell, D. J. (2006). Observed
differences between early childhood programs in the U.S. and Korea: Reflections of ?developmentally
appropriate practices? in two cultural contexts. Journal of Applied DevelopmentalPsychology, 27(5),
427-443.
Connolly, P. (2011). Using survey data to explore preschool children?s ethnic awareness and
attitudes. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 9(2), 175-187.
Hand, K., & Wise, S. (2004). Parenting partnerships in culturally diverse childcare settings: A
care provider perspective. Research Paper No 36. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies