No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Legal Aspects of Corrections Management

Facts of the Case: This is a summary of events that provide context to the issues discussed in the appeal. This most often includes a summary of events that lead to an arrest and trial of the defendant. It should also include some of the arguments made by the parties in the case which are related to the reason for the appeal. For example, a person may be arrested for possession of a controlled substance. His attorney may have argued that police conducted an illegal search and that the evidence should be suppressed and not used against him during the trial. After the defendant’s conviction, this objection provides the basis for the defendant’s appeal to an appellate court. This summary should include a description of the reasoning and ruling of all the lower courts involved in this case. For example, a case that has made it to the Supreme Court will have moved through more than one appellate court first. Describe each court’s decision on the issue. This summary may also include the original trial court judge’s ruling on the issue and possibly that trial court judge’s reasoning.
Procedural History: Each appellate case will have a legal basis for appeal in which one of the parties involved in the case will assert that an error was committed during the original trial. Using the example above the defendant’s attorney may argue that the conviction of his client should be reversed because of a violation of his client’s rights. Other precedents (previous cases) may be cited in making this argument. Be sure to include the precise error alleged to have been made. (e.g. 4th amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches)
Judgment: This is the outcome of the case. The final decision was handed down by the highest appellate court. Was the original outcome of the trial court affirmed, reversed, remanded, modified, etc? In addition to the ruling, including the court’s reasoning behind the ruling citing any precedent the court relied on. If there is a dissenting opinion (judges on the court who do not agree with the majority decision), please include their reasoning.
Your Thoughts and Opinion: This is where I want to hear your own opinion or ideas about the case. Make it at least a paragraph but more is better. Is this a good/bad decision? Do you think there will be unintended consequences because of this decision? You are not confined to any particular issues in this section as long as you explain and justify your opinion.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

The defendant, John Smith, was arrested for possession of a controlled substance. He was searched by the police without a warrant and the drugs were found on his person. Smith was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and appealed his conviction to the appellate court.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

The trial court denied Smith’s motion to suppress the evidence, finding that the search was justified because the police had probable cause to believe that Smith was in possession of drugs. Smith appealed the trial court’s decision to the appellate court.

Issue

The issue on appeal was whether the search of Smith was illegal.

Judgment

The appellate court reversed the trial court’s decision and suppressed the evidence. The court held that the search was illegal because the police did not have a warrant and did not have probable cause to believe that Smith was in possession of drugs.

Reasoning

The appellate court reasoned that the police did not have probable cause to believe that Smith was in possession of drugs because they did not have any specific information about him or his activities. The court also found that the search was not justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement, because the drugs were not in plain view when the police conducted the search.

Dissenting Opinion

The dissenting judge argued that the search was justified because the police had probable cause to believe that Smith was in possession of drugs. The judge also argued that the search was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement.

Your Thoughts and Opinion

I believe that the appellate court made the correct decision in this case. The search of Smith was illegal because the police did not have a warrant and did not have probable cause to believe that he was in possession of drugs. The “plain view” exception does not apply in this case because the drugs were not in plain view when the police conducted the search.

I do not think that there will be any unintended consequences as a result of this decision. The police will still be able to conduct searches when they have probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed. However, they will need to obtain a warrant before conducting a search if they do not have probable cause. This will help to protect the privacy rights of individuals.

I think that this is a good decision because it upholds the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. It is also a good decision because it sends a message to the police that they need to respect the rights of individuals when conducting searches.

I hope this helps!

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

[ordersys_quote]

Satisfaction Guaranteed

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments