King's claim

King's claim that segregation Is what I'd like to focus on specifically because it was the cause of his decision to break unjust law with injustice and he was very concerned about achieving equality and remove the discrimination the white community power tried to apply on black people especially negroes who suffered from breaking their human rights in Birmingham which was the most city suffering from segregation. For the background, I want to cover the history of Birmingham campaign that led to king's arrest and his arrest itself in addition to his position in certain organizations dealing with human rights because his issue was in Birmingham city, the city of segregation and he was calling action for non violent protest to achieve justice and save weak people especially black. Think king's analogies and definitions are important to supporting his claim. Historical analogies draws reader's attention to stand with king about non violent protest in relation to history of religion and bible. In this way king want to show for his people that he's believable, fair and true man in relation to God and apostle for carrying gospel of freedom. King used argument from cause to allow the reader to share or imagine himself in the same situation of suffering from restricting human rights Additionally, king used argument from definitions about just and unjust laws, violent and non violent tension, and direct action.He defined them just to won readers to his idea he wrote them as if he's a lawyer and he's right about disobeying unjust laws for injustice. So,| think Martin Luther King's letter was very effective rhetorical and supportive for his claim and he appealed to readers and persuade them to think the same way to call for justice by nonviolent tension.