Introduction to Middle East; "Iranian Revolution."

Introduction to Middle East; "Iranian Revolution." write about "Iranian Revolution." I will attach the reference material. You should read this reading, but you don't need only with this data. You can search other data. (If you want to refer to the book, you can!) The following is book link. https://books.google.com/books?id=99D9skuTyGwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+arab&hl=en&sa=X&ei=UveRVLPWFYq4yQSA04LoAg&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=the%20arab&f=false LCA 266 CLASS NOTES: 1 INTRO TO THE MODERN MIDDLE EAST Mosaddeq Era The increase of nationalist and radical sentiment after the Second World War in Iran inflamed Iranian resentment over the political and economic control exercised by the AIOC (Anglo-Iranian Oil Company). The AIOC (later BP, or British Petroleum) was seen (rightly) as a major cause and channel for British Influence and control over Iran. Who was Mohammad Mosaddeg? Mohammad Mosaddeq was a high-born western-trained liberal nationalist intellectual who started his Iranian official career as a teen-ager, continued briefly to attack Reza Shah’s programs in the majlis. He was soon put out of office and retired to his estate, reemerging to prominence in WWII. By late 1949 Mosaddeq was part of a nationalist political group in-between the Tudeh (Masses) party on the left and the right. He was a highly popular political leader known for his early opposition to Reza Shah and foreign control over Iran. Lead up to the 1953 Coup: i Popular sentirnent and demonstrations were so marked by 1950 that the majlis turned completely to a pro-Mosaddeq position. o Nationalization of the oil industry was approved by the majlis in March 1951 and soon thereafter Mosaddeq became premier, replacing the shah’s choice, Hosain Ala. Mosaddeq headed a coalition of secular and religious nationalist parties, the National Front. American officials were increasingly alarmed by the “radical” (i.e., independent nationalist) implications of Iranian actions. The Tudeh party also gained in strength and helped push Iran toward anti-British and anti-American policies. The refusal of AIOC to meet the 50-50 profit-division pattern seen in new American oil agreements until it was too late, and its obstinacy on other issues, moved many moderates to favor nationalization, as did pressures from street demonstrations and threats of assassination. PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)