Consider an intercultural conflict you have experienced. The conflict could be interpersonal, intergroup OR international/global (see the textbook for an example of each context). Write paper (750-1000 words) analyzing the conflict using the 3 frames (micro, meso, AND macro) (see the textbook for examples of analysis using all three frames). Steps to do this:
● Read Chapter 9.
● Write a brief description (1-2 paragraphs) of the conflict.
● Analyze the conflict based on the ideas and concepts in chapter 9 of Sorrells. Specifically, identify the micro, meso and macro-level dimensions/frames of the conflict.
● Answer based on your understanding of intercultural communication, what suggestions can you offer to resolve the conflict? When thinking about solutions be sure to refer to the solutions offered in the text; however you are also welcome to offer an alternative solution and state why it's better (more appropriate) to solve this particular conflict.
Intercultural conflict you have experienced
Full Answer Section
asked Isabelle if something was unclear about my idea. She explained that my thumbs-up gesture, which signifies approval in the US, can be interpreted as a rude and dismissive sign in some European countries, including France.
Micro-Level Analysis:
This conflict occurred at the micro-level, focusing on the immediate interaction between individuals. My nonverbal communication, specifically the thumbs-up gesture, clashed with the cultural norms of my French and Spanish colleagues. This miscommunication led to a breakdown in the flow of ideas and created an awkward tension within the group. My lack of awareness regarding the cultural interpretation of the gesture caused unintentional offense. Additionally, my colleagues' initial hesitant response could be attributed to their desire to maintain group harmony and avoid direct confrontation.
Meso-Level Analysis:
The meso-level analysis examines the role of social groups and power dynamics. In this instance, the social group was our student project team. Each member brought their own cultural background and communication styles to the table. The power dynamic was relatively equal, as we were all students working towards a common goal. However, the incident highlighted the potential for cultural differences to create misunderstandings within seemingly homogenous groups like a student team. Furthermore, the dominance of American pop culture can lead to the unconscious assumption that American gestures are universally understood.
Macro-Level Analysis:
The macro-level analysis considers the broader societal and historical contexts that influence intercultural communication. In this case, the historical and cultural differences between the United States and Europe played a role. The thumbs-up gesture might have originated in ancient Rome as a symbol of disapproval, potentially influencing its interpretation in some European cultures. Additionally, historical power dynamics between the US and Europe can create a perception of American cultural dominance, making individuals from these regions more sensitive to perceived American arrogance or insensitivity.
Resolving the Conflict:
Drawing upon the insights from Sorrells' Chapter 9 on Intercultural Communication, here are some suggestions to resolve this conflict:
- Increased Self-Awareness: As the individual who initiated the non-verbal cue, I should have been more aware of the potential for cultural misunderstandings. Researching common nonverbal communication cues in different cultures would have helped prevent this conflict.
- Active Listening and Empathy: My colleagues could have practiced active listening by asking clarifying questions about my body language or tone. Additionally, practicing empathy and understanding that cultural differences can lead to miscommunication would have fostered a more open and collaborative environment.
- Open Communication: Open communication is crucial in resolving intercultural conflicts. Once I realized the misunderstanding, I should have directly apologized and explained the intended meaning of my gesture. Similarly, my colleagues could have openly communicated their discomfort with the gesture, allowing for a learning opportunity for everyone involved.
An alternative solution, suggested by Sorrells, involves using a more context-specific approach (Sorrells, 2020). In this case, I could have rephrased my idea with more descriptive language instead of relying solely on the thumbs-up gesture. This approach acknowledges the limitations of nonverbal communication and emphasizes the importance of clear verbal communication when working across cultures.
This particular conflict highlights the limitations of a "one size fits all" approach to communication. By adopting a more nuanced understanding of cultural contexts and practicing self-awareness, active listening, and open communication, we can navigate intercultural conflicts and foster more productive and respectful interactions.
Sample Answer
This paper analyzes an intercultural conflict I experienced while studying abroad in Barcelona, Spain. The conflict arose from a simple misunderstanding of a common gesture between different cultures.
The Conflict:
I was part of a student group project with three other classmates – two from Spain (Ana and Miguel), and one from France (Isabelle). During a brainstorming session, I passionately proposed an idea, emphasizing my point with a thumbs-up gesture and an enthusiastic nod. To my surprise, Ana and Miguel exchanged a confused glance, and Isabelle furrowed her brow. The atmosphere shifted, and the conversation stalled. I felt my enthusiasm deflate, unsure what had gone wrong. Later, I he