Impact of corporate social responsibility on the turnover of a company'. I think we can move forward with this topic. I am going to upload the requirement for the Research Proposal immediately.

Impact of corporate social responsibility on the turnover of a company'. I think we can move forward with this topic. I am going to upload the requirement for the Research Proposal immediately. Order Description Based on our conclusion ;Impact of corporate social responsibility on the turnover of a company'. I think we can move forward with this topic. I am going to upload the requirement for the Research Proposal immediately. ARUMBARM008 Research Methods Assignment Date for Submission: Please refer to the timetable on ilearn (The submission portal on ilearn will close at 13.59 UK time on the date of submission) Page 1 of 7 Assignment Brief As part of the formal assessment for ARUMBARM008 you are required to submit a Research Methods assignment. Please refer to your Student Handbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and general information on preparing and submitting assignments. Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this module the student will be expected to: 1. 2. 3. 4. Critically appraise and evaluate the contribution primary and secondary data sources can make to research studies, particularly with respect to sampling, statistical analysis and data presentation techniques. Critically appraise and evaluate research undertaken by others. Undertake multidisciplinary research through the acquisition of skills relevant to the context of business and management. Effectively plan and undertake personal development including the awareness of an ethical and socially responsibly dimension to decision making. Assignment Task You are required to produce a research proposal for a dissertation in a management related field. The proposal prepared may be the one which you follow for your dissertation but this is not essential. If you eventually choose another topic for your dissertation you will have to go through a similar process as that required for this assessment on that topic. It would therefore be sensible to think carefully about the topic choice and decide now what your dissertation will be about. For those on an MBA named route the eventual dissertation must relate to that route. Your answer should include the detail below. Format: The format should broadly follow the plan provided below. Diagrams and charts may be added to clarify and illustrate points. Research Questions & Objectives Explanation of the problem/issue and justify why it is important, both from an organisational and a personal perspective, and a series of precisely written objectives, to include observable outcomes, that flow from this. Literature review Demonstrate knowledge of relevant literature by identifying key debates: concepts and theories within the topic area and how the literature will be utilised to inform your research. Methodology Explanation of fundamental issues in methodology followed by a full description of the methodological approach to be adopted. This and your data collection methods should be justified and you should explore issues of validity, reliability and generalisability of the research proposal and make reference to ethical issues. You Page 2 of 7 should also discuss relevant practical issues relating to the research to be undertaken e.g. organisational consent and timescales. A more detailed project plan should be appended. Overall Structure of Proposal Appropriate use of references. Harvard referencing to be used in both the text and bibliography – all detail to be included. Logical structure, report format. Practical Issues ? Your assessment should be submitted as a single word or pdf file. For more information please see the “Guide to Submitting an Assignment” document available on the module page on ilearn. ? Including quotations, but exclusive of the bibliography and appendices, the assignment must not exceed 3,000 words in length. ? You are required to state the word count on the front page ? The word count excludes the title page, executive summary, reference list and appendices. Where assessment questions have been reprinted from the assessment brief these will also be excluded from the word count. ALL other printed words ARE included in the word count. Printed words include those contained within charts and tables. See ‘Word Count Policy’ on the homepage of this module for more information. ? Assignments submitted late will not be accepted and will be marked as a 0% fail. ? You MUST underpin your analysis and evaluation of the key issues with appropriate and wide ranging academic research and ensure this is referenced using the Harvard system. The My Study Skills Area contains the following useful resources; Study Skills Guide (containing a Harvard Referencing section) and a Harvard Referencing Interactive Tutorial. You must use the Harvard Referencing method in your assignment. ? You must ensure that the submitted assignment is all your own work and that all sources used are correctly attributed. Penalties apply to assignments which show evidence of academic unfair practice. (See the Student Handbook which is available in the Induction Area on ilearn). Assessment criteria The proposal will be assessed for its overall quality; in particular the extent to which the components fit together and its suitability for masters level research. You will need to demonstrate that you have withheld pre-conceived ideas and organised your arguments logically. The proposal needs to convince the reader as to its suitability and your ability to undertake the work. A mark sheet and marking criteria are attached. The work will be marked on a percentage basis, with 40 percent being the pass mark. You should take careful note of where marks are allocated and ensure that you address these areas in your proposal. Once you have identified your area it is worth contacting your tutor with a brief outline of what you intend to do with your objectives clearly set out in order to receive some feedback before you undertake the main writing up. Page 3 of 7 Marking Scheme and Feedback Sheet for Research Proposal Student’s Name: ……………………………………………………………………… Date: ………………..…. Key to marking scheme in each section: marks = criteria is fully met 0 = no evidence of meeting criteria; full Research Questions and Objectives Clearly explains problem/issue, justifying why it is important both from an organisational and a personal perspective and provides precisely written research questions and observable outcomes that flow from this Indicative Literature Review Demonstrates knowledge of the relevant literature by identifying key debates, concepts and theories and explains how the literature will be used to inform the research design Methodology Provides an explanation of fundamental issues of research methodology. Explains and justifies the research strategy and data collection methods to be used and in relation to the proposed research explores the concepts of validity, reliability and generalisability and ethical and practical issues. A detailed project plan should be appended. Overall Structure Uses report format and presents items in a logical structure. Uses Harvard referencing in text and bibliography 15% 30% 15% 30% 10% Numerical grading relates to the ‘grading criteria’ handout, whilst comments below provide qualitative feedback on your research proposal. It is strongly suggested that you use the marks allocated to each section to guide the number of words allocated to each part of the mark scheme. Page 4 of 7 Key strengths of this proposal: Main areas for improvement: Final Mark: ……… (subject to the approval of the External Examiner) First Marker ………………………… Second Marker ………………………….. Page 5 of 7 Level 7 is characterised by an expectation of students’ expertise in their specialism. Students are semi-autonomous, demonstrating independence in the negotiation of assessment tasks (including the major project) and the ability to evaluate, challenge, modify and develop theory and practice. Students are expected to demonstrate an ability to isolate and focus on the significant features of problems and to offer synthetic and coherent solutions, with some students producing original or innovative work in their specialism that is worthy of publication or public performance or display. Generic Learning Outcomes (GLOs) (Academic Regulations, Section 2) Mark Bands Outcome Characteristics of Student Achievement by Marking Band Knowledge & Understanding Intellectual (thinking), Practical, Affective and Transferable Skills 90-100% Exceptional analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics with very clear originality and autonomy. Exceptional development of conceptual structures and argument making an exceptional use of scholarly conventions. Demonstrates independence of thought and a very high level of intellectual rigour and consistency. Work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and may be considered for external publication Exceptional analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics. Exceptional development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Exceptional research skills, independence of thought, an extremely high level of intellectual rigour and consistency, exceptional expressive/professional skills, and substantial creativity and originality. Exceptional academic/intellectual skills. Work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and may be considered for external publication 80-89% Outstanding analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics with clear originality and autonomy. Outstanding development of conceptual structures and argument making an exemplary use of scholarly conventions. Demonstrates independence of thought and a very high level of intellectual rigour and consistency Outstanding analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics. Very high level development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Outstanding research skills, independence of thought, a high level of intellectual rigour and consistency, outstanding expressive/professional skills, and considerable creativity and originality. Exemplary academic/intellectual skills 70-79% Excellent analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics. Excellent development of conceptual structures and argument making excellent use of scholarly conventions. Demonstrates independence of thought and a high level of intellectual rigour and consistency Excellent analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics. High level development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Excellent research skills, independence of thought, a high level of intellectual rigour and consistency, excellent expressive/ professional skills, and considerable creativity and originality. Excellent academic/intellectual skills, and considerable creativity and originality 60-69% Good analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics. Development of conceptual structures and argument making consistent use of scholarly conventions Good analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics. Development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions 50-59% Satisfactory knowledge of key issues/ concepts/ethics in discipline. Descriptive in parts but some ability to synthesise scholarship and argument. Minor lapses in use of scholarly conventions Satisfactory knowledge of key issues/ concepts/ethics in discipline. Descriptive in parts but some ability to synthesise scholarship and argument. Minor lapses in use of scholarly conventions Achieves module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level 40-49% A marginal pass in module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level Basic knowledge of key issues/concepts/ethics in discipline. Generally descriptive, with restricted synthesis of existing scholarship and little argument. Use of scholarly conventions inconsistent Basic knowledge of key issues/concepts/ethics in discipline. Generally descriptive, with restricted synthesis of existing scholarship and little argument. Use of scholarly conventions inconsistent. 30-39% A marginal fail in module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level. Possible compensation. Satisfies qualifying mark Limited knowledge of key issues/concepts/ethics in discipline. Largely descriptive, with restricted synthesis of existing scholarship and limited argument. Limited use of scholarly conventions. Limited research skills impede use of learning resources and problem solving. Significant problems with structure/accuracy in expression. Team/Practical/ Professional skills not yet secure. Weak academic/ intellectual skills. Limited use of scholarly conventions Little evidence of knowledge of key issues/concepts/ethics in discipline. Largely descriptive, with little synthesis of existing scholarship and little evidence of argument. Little evidence of use of scholarly conventions. Little evidence of research skills, use of learning resources and problem solving. Major problems with structure/ accuracy in expression. Team/Practical/Professional skills virtually absent. Very weak academic/intellectual skills. Little evidence of use of scholarly conventions Inadequate knowledge of key issues/concepts/ethics in discipline. Wholly descriptive, with inadequate synthesis of existing scholarship and inadequate argument. Inadequate use of scholarly conventions. Inadequate use of research skills, learning resources and problem solving. Major problems with structure/accuracy in expression. Team/Practical/Professional skills absent. Extremely weak academic/intellectual skills. Inadequate use of scholarly conventions 20-29% 10-19% Fails to achieve module outcome(s) related to this GLO. Qualifying mark not satisfied. No compensation available Page 6 of 7 1-9% 0% No evidence of knowledge of key issues/concepts/ethics in discipline. Incoherent and completely but poorly descriptive, with no evidence of synthesis of existing scholarship and no argument whatsoever. No evidence of use of scholarly conventions. No evidence of use of research skills, learning resources and problem solving. Incoherent structure/accuracy in expression. Team/Practical/Professional skills nonexistent. No evidence of academic/intellectual skills. No evidence of use of scholarly conventions Awarded for: (i) non-submission; (ii) dangerous practice and; (iii) in situations where the student fails to address the assignment brief (eg: answers the wrong question) and/or related learning outcomes Page 7 of 7 PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)