IDENTIFYING/DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

CASE OF STUART

Intake Date: November 2018

IDENTIFYING/DEMOGRAPHIC DATA: Stuart is a 19-year-old, biracial male who was raised in Hugo, Oklahoma. Stuart’s mom is Caucasian and his father is African American. Stuart has 3 siblings all younger than him. Stuart is in his first year at college and lives on campus.

CHIEF COMPLAINT/PRESENTING PROBLEM: Stuart presented in the emergency room (ER) having been brought in by his mother and a friend. Stuart indicated that he was having a strange experience – “I go into another world. I can hear people talking, but I can’t talk back. I can no longer trust my roommate – he is taking my food and hiding it”

HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: Stuart reports beginning to feel strange one month after he started school in August. He reports hearing voices outside his window in the dorm. It was an angel’s voice calling his name. That is when he realized he cannot trust his roommate. He realized the roommate would put TV shows on that were referencing how Stuart was doing in his classes. His school papers were all over his room and he could not organize them the way he wants. At times, the fireflies outside told him about his roommate.

In high school, Stuart socialized with his classmates and was engaged in leisure activities. He went to the senior prom and enjoyed the summer prior to college. Since coming to college, Stuart’s roommate reports Stuart was socially withdrawn.

PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: Stuart’s mom does not report any psychiatric issues with Stuart in the past. His behavior was a typical teenage behavior, video games, dressing unusual, thinking in a way that differs from his parents beliefs.

SUBSTANCE USE HISTORY: Stuart denies consumption of alcohol or illicit drugs. He denies ever using chemicals that were not prescribed to him. Stuart reports now that he thinks about it he is glad he never used drugs since drug dealers will kill their clients.

PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: Mother reports Stuart broke his arm at 7 years old. The arm healed successfully. Stuart had all his childhood shots, but she does recall her fear of his health early on when Stuart was 2 ½ weeks old he came down with a spring cold.

FAMILY MEDICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: There was no significant information about the family history.

CURRENT FAMILY ISSUES AND DYNAMICS: Stuart was incoherent during most of the interview. He was able to indicate some history that was inconsistent with history taken from his mother. Mother indicated that Stuart was picked up several times within the past two months by campus police for “talking in public”.

MENTAL STATUS EXAM: Stuart presented as a casually dressed, unwashed young man. He has a fluctuating mood and an anxious expression on his face. Motor activity appeared agitated. Mood was anxious alternating with hostility and depression. Speech was pressured at times and inappropriately loud. His affect was inappropriate and at times blunted. Stuart’s thought processes were at times incoherent and at times displayed a marked loosening of associations. He also reported bizarre delusions and auditory hallucinations. Stuart’s wishes for 5 years from now were unobtainable. Stuart is oriented to time, place, and person. He was able to state the season. Stuart can name 3 different objects correctly (bed, apple, shoe). He needed to calculate 100 – 3 five times.

SUICIDAL/HOMICIDAL ASSESSMENT: Unable to ascertain.

in 1–2 pages, respond to the following:

Explain how you support the diagnosis by specifically identifying the criteria from the case study.
Describe in detail how the client’s symptoms match up with the specific diagnostic criteria for the disorder (or all the disorders) that you finally selected for the client. You do not need to repeat the diagnostic code in the explanation.
Identify the differential diagnosis you considered.
Explain why you excluded this diagnosis/diagnoses.
Explain the specific factors of culture that are or may be relevant to the case and the diagnosis, which may include the cultural concepts of distress.
Explain why you chose the Z codes you have for this client.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

Diagnosis and Rationale

Based on the information provided, Stuart most likely meets the criteria for Schizophrenia according to the DSM-5. Here’s how the case study supports this diagnosis:

Criteria Met:

  • Symptoms: Stuart exhibits several symptoms consistent with Schizophrenia:
    • Hallucinations: He hears voices (auditory hallucinations) and sees fireflies communicating with him.
    • Delusions: He believes his roommate steals his food and controls the TV based on his academic performance (bizarre delusions).
    • Disorganized Speech: His speech is pressured and sometimes incoherent, indicating a loose association of thoughts.
    • Disorganized Behavior: His agitated behavior and social withdrawal suggest disorganized behavior.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

    • Negative Symptoms: His blunted affect and difficulty planning for the future suggest negative symptoms.
  • Duration: The symptoms have been present for at least one month, meeting the duration criteria.
  • Functional Impairment: Social withdrawal, difficulty managing schoolwork, and episodes with campus police indicate significant functional impairment.
  • Not Attributable to Substance Use: Stuart denies any history of substance abuse, eliminating that as a cause.

Differential Diagnosis and Exclusion

Other possible diagnoses were considered:

  • Schizoaffective Disorder: This was considered due to the presence of both psychotic symptoms and mood changes. However, the case study doesn’t provide enough detail about the mood symptoms’ duration and severity to definitively support this diagnosis.
  • Bipolar Disorder with Psychotic Features: Similar to schizoaffective disorder, the case study lacks sufficient detail about the mood symptoms’ nature and duration to confirm this diagnosis.
  • Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features: The presence of social withdrawal and depressed mood could suggest this. However, the prominent hallucinations and delusions point more towards Schizophrenia.

These diagnoses were excluded because Schizophrenia best explains the constellation of symptoms, including persistent hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thinking and behavior, and significant functional impairment, all lasting for over a month.

Cultural Considerations

While the case study doesn’t mention specific cultural factors impacting the diagnosis, it’s important to consider cultural variations in the expression of mental health symptoms. Here are some points to consider:

  • Expression of Distress: Some cultures might express emotional distress through somatic complaints rather than verbalizing hallucinations or delusions. A culturally sensitive evaluation would explore how Stuart expresses distress within his cultural context.
  • Help-Seeking Behaviors: There might be cultural norms around seeking help for mental health issues. Understanding Stuart’s cultural background could provide insight into any delays in seeking professional help.

Z Codes

The case study doesn’t mention any specific Z codes. However, depending on the situation, relevant Z codes could include:

  • Z91.1: Problems with education and schooling. This could be relevant due to Stuart’s academic difficulties.
  • Z60.4: Encounter with law enforcement. This code might be relevant if there were documented interactions with campus police related to his behavior.

It’s important to note that a definitive diagnosis should be made by a qualified mental health professional after a comprehensive evaluation. This analysis provides a starting point based on the limited information available in the case study.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer