HYPOTHESIS 2

please reflect to your previous 2 paper you were assigned from me. This is a long session project so i will be assigning you the other 9 if you continue to do a great job. please take your time and help me make that A. If you have to change the RQ do so that RQ is just an outline to a future research paper. RQ:how does a person who experiences toxic leadership outside the organization affect the individual's efficiency and cost-benefit within an organization? HYPOTHESIS 2 (IF THERE IS ANOTHER KEY EFFECT ON DV/S; IF NOT RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN IVS OR MODERATION EFFECTS) Required Reading The studies you gather in your SLP task. Optional Reading Relevant studies that cite the studies you gather in your SLP task. Relevant studies that are cited by the studies you gather in your SLP task. Assignment Overview This case assignment focuses on hypothesis 2. The convention is that you start with the key effect on your DV (the right side of the model), and move your way to the left side in future modules. This hypothesis can be based on two sources of data: (1) overarching theories which have been applied in other or similar contexts, and now you adapt them to your specific context; or (2) existing studies which showed such or similar effects, but did not anchor them in theory. If the latter is the case, you should theorize, using your own logic, why you expect such an effect. Regardless, you should first find the relevant literature (SLP), and synthesize it (case). Assignment Overview Please read and reflect on the papers you identified in the SLP assignment, and synthesize them to produce the text leading to hypothesis 2. Follow a structure you have seen in one or more of the published research papers you reviewed. Conclude this section with the hypothesis statement. Please organize your paper in a scholarly way. Add section titles when necessary. Explain your logic and when appropriate, use external sources and use proper citations. The paper is usually between 2 and 5 pages long. Assignment Expectations Able to understand the key themes in your reading list. Able to effectively and efficiently synthesize the reading materials. Write the text leading to the hypothesis with clarity, depth and critical thinking. Completeness and coherence: Chain of thought is easy to follow. Collected relevant evidences and consulted additional papers/resources to support the propositions. Paper is clearly written with appropriate format. Reference list is complete. Citation is properly done.