Human Resourece Management- Research Methods - Choice a topic according your own knowledge

Human Resourece Management- Research Methods - Choice a topic according your own knowledge Critically discuss the extent to which the context within which the research takes place, determines the research design. In order to answer this question you should consider the following:- Size, type and age of organisation(s) The subject under investigation Access to organisation(s), research sample, data etc. Ethical issues Your role as a researcher Your answer must be supported by appropriate academic underpinning. Categories of contexts of research Size of org (SME, MNC) Sector (Public, private, NFP) Industry Sector (education, retail, engineering, etc.) Hierarchical level of workforce (Senior, white, blue) Organisational structure (hierarchical, flat) Time allowable Skill level of workforce Subject matter (delicate, sensitive, controversial etc.) Location (country) Location (accessibility) No. of sites (1, 2, 10, 20) Language (of researcher) Language (of subject/s) Quality of data/information required Quantity of data/information required Culture of organisation Culture of participant(s) Diversity of workforce Age of workforce Gender of workforce Level of trust in organisation Available budget Skill level of researcher Accessibility to sample Accessibility to information/data Type of research question Nature of research question Income levels Leadership style Patterns of employment Role of technology Levels of bureaucracy Organisational strategy and objectives Ethical considerations Role of researcher (insider/outsider) Aspects of Research Inductive Positivism Interview Ethnography Theory Critical Realism Mixed Methods Longitudinal Questionnaire Nature of reality Participant Bias Deductive Data collection methods Validity Interpretivism Focus group Case study Researcher Bias Quantitative Diaries Variable Hypothesis Sample Selection Reliability Experiment Observation Multiple Methods Action Research Generalisation Qualitative Data analysis Pragmatism Propositions Cross-sectional Grounded-Theory Ethical issues/approval Research Objectives (clarity) Subjectivity Limitations Objectivity ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:  You will be marked according to the attached Postgraduate Assignment Assessment Sheet on page 4. Word Length:    3000 (+/- 10%). Any penalties for not complying with word limits will be in accordance with University and Faculty policy. PLAGIARISM WARNING! – Assignments should not be copied in part or in whole from any other source, except for any marked up quotations, that clearly distinguish what has been quoted from your own work. All references used must be given, and the specific page number used should also be given for any direct quotations, which should be in inverted commas. Students found copying from the internet or other sources will get zero marks and may be excluded from the university. Postgraduate Assignment Assessment Sheet Module name:    Research Methods    Module no:    M32HRM Student name: Student no: Assignment title: The role of context in research design Examiner name: First marker/Second Marker (delete as required)__________________________________________________________________________ Distinction (70-100)*    Merit (60-69)    Pass (50-59)    Pass (40-49)    Fail (0-39)    Mark Nature of topic(s) (10%) Identifies and describes the nature of topic(s) critically and thoroughly Identifies and describes the nature of topic(s) correctly and critically Identifies the nature of topic(s) correctly with adequate description Identifies the nature of topic(s) correctly with some description Fails to identify the nature of topic(s) correctly Literature review (30%)     Has evidence of reading on relevant material beyond those given in teaching sessions or exercises Refers extensively to sources Evaluates literature logically and critically Shows evidence of accessing and reading on relevant material Refers to adequate sources Analyses literature clearly and critically Demonstrates clear understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues Refers to some sources Discusses literature thoroughly with some critical analysis Presents some understanding of theories, concepts and issues Refers to a few sources Describes literature with limited critical analysis     Shows limited or no understanding of relevant literature Refers to limited or no sources Describes literature with no critical analysis Analysis and discussion (35%)     Presents strong and critical analysis and discussion well-grounded in literature Shows both depth and breadth of understanding of the topic(s) Has well-reasoned arguments shown in analysis and discussion based on literature Presents appropriate understanding of the topic(s) Has logical and clear arguments shown in analysis and discussion based on literature Demonstrates clear understanding of the topic(s) Demonstrates some arguments in analysis and discussion based on literature Shows basic understanding of the topic(s)     Has unsubstantiated and invalid analysis and discussion based on anecdotes and generalisation Presents limited or no understanding of the topic(s) Distinction (70-100)*    Merit (60-69)    Pass (50-59)    Pass (40-49)    Fail (0-39)    Mark Conclusion and recommendation (15%)     Summarises the assignment thoroughly and critically Provides realistic and feasible recommendations Summarises the assignment clearly and critically Provides logical recommendations Summarises the assignment adequately Provides some recommendations Summarises the assignment briefly Provides a few recommendations Provides limited or no summary of the assignment Presents limited or no recommendations Presentation and reference (10%)     Conveys all information clearly and completely with logical order Displays excellent use of reference style Delivers information clearly and accurately with sound structure Shows correct use of reference style with minor errors Conveys content consistently without misunderstanding Displays correct reference style but a few inconsistencies     Conveys content adequately without misunderstanding Displays correct reference style but some inconsistencies     Provides vague content with many errors Presents limited or no referencing with incorrect style For a mark of 80+, the assignment should be of sufficient standard to demonstrate high degree of understanding and critical/analytical skills, where specified. Outstanding in all respects.   PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)