hedging techniques that firms use to manage currency risk

hedging techniques that firms use to manage currency risk

Faculty of Business Environment and Society

Please note:
1.     All work submitted after the submission deadline without an approved valid reason (see below) will be given a mark of zero. (This is not the same as a non-submission, as a late submission counts as an attempt and a mark of zero may allow you to resit the coursework.).
2.    Short deferrals (extensions) of up to three calendar weeks can only be given for genuine “force majeure” and medical reasons, not for bad planning of your time. Please note that theft, loss, or failure to keep a back-up file, are not valid reasons. The short deferral must be applied for on or before the submission date. You can apply for a short deferral by submitting an Examination/ Coursework Deferral Application Form. Application Forms along with the supporting evidence should go to the relevant Student Support Office (WM404). For a longer delay in submission a student may apply for a (long) deferral.
Students MUST keep an electronic file of their assignment.

The electronic version of your assignment may be used to enable checks to be made using anti-plagiarism software and approved plagiarism checking websites.

Word Length              Maximum/ Minimum/Range    1500 to 2500  words.

Any penalties for not complying with word limits will be in accordance with University and Faculty policy

Learning Outcomes Assessed

The following learning outcomes are being assessed..

2.  Compare the financial products available on international markets
3. Devise and apply appropriate strategies using derivatives to manage currency risk.
4. Critically evaluate the use of derivative instruments to manage currency risk.

Assessment Criteria

Please see feedback pro-forma.

For information on how marks are awarded for particular elements of this assignment see please see the feedback pro-forma.

Return of Marked Work
You can expect to have marked work returned to you by 2 weeks after the submission date

PLAGIARISM WARNING! – Assignments should not be copied in part or in whole from any other source, except for any marked up quotations, that clearly distinguish what has been quoted from your own work. Additionally, the specific page number used should also be given for any direct quotations, which should be in inverted commas, per Harvard referencing format.  Citations MUST be used and all references used must be given, using Harvard referencing format.  Students found copying from the internet or other sources will get zero marks and may be excluded from the university.


There are four different commonly used financial hedging techniques and some operational hedging techniques that firms use to manage currency risk.

1) Drawing on literature, critically evaluate all relevant hedging techniques used by large firms. Illustrate your arguments with appropriate examples / cases / empirical studies review.
(35 marks)

2) Drawing on literature, critically evaluate all relevant hedging techniques used by small firms. Illustrate your arguments with appropriate examples / cases / empirical studies review.
(35 marks)

3) Compare the similarities and differences of the use of these hedging techniques by large and small firms.
(30 marks)

Introductory Section
Interpretation of questions and introductions (10%)    Launches straight into project with no attempt to introduce or define the topics that will be covered in each section    The introduction is perfunctory with a limited attempt to define the scope of the report/topics to be discussed    Clearly understands and states the key issues of the report.
Body of project
Logical development (15%)    This is confused and disorganised so that the story is obscure.    Could be better organised. Sequence of some material being rather illogical.    Develops a logical argument and marshals ideas clearly.
Subject relevance (15%)    Contains too much irrelevant/repetitive subject matter.    Some irrelevant / repetitive material.    All material is relevant.
Strength and depth of analysis (30%)    Too much reliance on written sources and undigested material. Little analysis.    Little personal input. Mainly from written sources. Some analysis.      Clear and informed analysis of subject matter. Well used real cases/data/empirical studies review to support discussion.
Use of sources (10%)    Use of one or few sources only    Use of a variety of reference material.    Has used and shows good grasp of all relevant references.
Conclusions (10%)    Report comes to an abrupt end without a proper concluding section.    Conclusions rather perfunctory.    Good concluding section drawing together the various points made.


find the cost of your paper