PerfectCustomPapers | Global community it could be with stockholders achieving more wealth with efficient markets

Global community it could be with stockholders achieving more wealth with efficient markets

What a wonderful global community it could be with stockholders achieving more wealth with efficient markets and great global products, full employments the world around, governments running surplus budgets and business-friendly cultures,

With the stakeholders, everyone wins. So, societies, citizens, the shareholders, and the governments all received their rewards. Really is quite fascinating how this dynamic works.

Questions:

Explain how each of the four stakeholders(with examples) benefit the organizations, such as government, employees, stockholders, and societies. Would this be any different for the global markets than what we have here in our country? Isn’t it really a win-win for all?

Should corporations be allowed free access to all societies of our global economy, or would it be best if corporations stayed in their own countries? Should we eliminate tariffs as only consumers pay it and the tariff only enriches the governments? California mandates that the minimum wage be $20/hour; so, no problem the price of our food at Chipotle just went up by 100%. Eliminate the corporate tax, as we, as consumers, pay it.

Does one concern themselves with the multinational coming into your country? Wouldn’t we all agree that Honda and Toyota, even Nestle’s chocolate, have moved us forward and provided us a lot with going forward with quality of life? Where would we be, much less where would the world be, without Starbucks coffee and their coffee bistros?

So, the USA enacted a tariff, and then China retaliates, and the only accomplishment is higher-priced products. So, eliminate or minimize these taxes? Some imports, such as washing machines, are so heavily taxed that we, as consumers, are taxed too much in the interests of protecting the US products and the domestic made washing machine.

Sample Answer

Your observation about a potential global win-win scenario for stakeholders is intriguing, but understanding the realities requires critical analysis. Let’s delve into your questions:

1. Stakeholder Benefits and Global Differences:

Benefits:

Governments: Increased tax revenue, economic growth, job creation. (Example: Apple manufacturing plants in China boosted their economy)
Employees: Competitive wages, career opportunities, skill development. (Example: Honda employs skilled workers in the US)
Stockholders: Improved profitability, dividends, increased company value. (Example: Amazon’s global expansion led to investor gains)

Full Answer Section

Societies: Access to goods and services, improved infrastructure, technological advancements. (Example: Microsoft’s global partnerships provide technology access)

Global Differences:

Labor standards and wages: Variations across countries can lead to concerns about exploitation or unfair competition.
Environmental regulations: Unequal enforcement can create competitive advantages for less regulated countries.
Cultural impact: Global corporations can influence local cultures, raising concerns about homogenization.

Win-Win?

While potential benefits exist, achieving a true win-win for all stakeholders can be challenging due to the complexities mentioned above. Addressing labor standards, environmental regulations, and cultural considerations is crucial for a more equitable and sustainable global community.

2. Free Access vs. Regulation:

Arguments for Free Access:

Promotes economic efficiency and competition.
Offers consumers wider product choices and potentially lower prices.
Encourages technological innovation and knowledge transfer.

Arguments for Regulation:

Protects domestic industries and jobs.
Ensures compliance with labor and environmental standards.
Maintains cultural distinctiveness.

Tariffs and Minimum Wage:

Tariffs can raise prices for consumers and protect inefficient domestic industries.
High minimum wages can lead to job losses or price increases, requiring careful economic analysis.

Finding the Balance:

Finding the balance between free access and regulation requires considering specific contexts and potential impacts. Openness to trade can be beneficial, but regulations are often necessary to ensure fair competition, protect workers and the environment, and preserve cultural identities.

3. Impact of Multinationals:

Positive Impacts:

Job creation and economic growth in host countries.
Introduction of new technologies and skills.
Increased access to goods and services.

Negative Impacts:

Exploitation of labor and resources.
Environmental damage.
Negative cultural influences.

Case-by-Case Analysis:

The impact of multinationals varies depending on the specific company, industry, and host country. While companies like Honda and Toyota have generally contributed positively, others may have had negative impacts.

Trade Wars and Tariffs:

Trade wars and retaliatory tariffs can harm consumers and businesses in all involved countries. Finding solutions through collaborative trade agreements and addressing unfair trade practices can be more effective.

Conclusion:

While the vision of a win-win global community with efficient markets and shared benefits is appealing, achieving it requires careful consideration of diverse stakeholder interests, potential inequalities, and the need for balanced regulations. Openness to trade and global interaction can be beneficial, but it must be accompanied by measures to ensure fairness, sustainability, and respect for cultural identities

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

No More Worries!

Paper Formatting

No Lateness!

Our Guarantees

Global community it could be with stockholders achieving more wealth with efficient markets

Sample Answer

Full Answer Section

This question has been answered.

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Why Choose Us