For or against the death penalty

Given the nation’s “war on crime,” there continues to be a great deal of attention paid to punishment, including speculation about the deterrent value of the death penalty. For this assignment, you are to take one side of the debate, either for or against the death penalty, and argue for the position that you take.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

Argument Against the Death Penalty

The death penalty is a controversial topic that has been debated for centuries. Some people believe that it is a necessary punishment for certain crimes, such as murder, while others believe that it is cruel and unusual punishment.

There are several reasons why the death penalty should be abolished. First, it is not an effective deterrent to crime. Studies have shown that the death penalty does not have a significant impact on crime rates. In fact, some studies have even shown that it may actually increase crime rates.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

Second, the death penalty is irreversible. If an innocent person is executed, there is no way to bring them back. In the United States, there have been over 180 people exonerated from death row since 1973. This means that innocent people have been sentenced to death and nearly executed for crimes they did not commit.

Third, the death penalty is disproportionately applied to minorities and the poor. In the United States, African Americans are more likely to be sentenced to death than whites, even when they commit the same crimes. Additionally, people who are poor are more likely to be sentenced to death because they cannot afford to hire good lawyers.

Fourth, the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment. Execution methods such as lethal injection and the electric chair can be very painful and inhumane. In some cases, executions have even been botched, resulting in the prolonged suffering of the condemned person.

Finally, the death penalty is not necessary. There are other ways to punish criminals and protect society, such as life in prison without the possibility of parole. Life in prison is a severe punishment, but it does not violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

In conclusion, the death penalty is an ineffective, irreversible, and cruel punishment. It should be abolished.

Example of a Creative Argument Against the Death Penalty

Imagine a world where the death penalty is no longer used. Criminals are still punished, but they are punished with rehabilitation and restitution, rather than execution. This world may seem like a fantasy, but it is possible.

One way to achieve this world is to focus on restorative justice. Restorative justice is a system of justice that focuses on repairing the harm that has been done by crime. It involves bringing the victim, the offender, and the community together to work on a solution that benefits everyone.

Restorative justice has been shown to be effective in reducing recidivism rates and improving the lives of victims. It is also a more humane way to punish criminals.

Another way to achieve a world without the death penalty is to invest in social programs that address the root causes of crime. These programs can include education programs, job training programs, and mental health treatment programs.

By investing in social programs, we can create a society where fewer people are tempted to commit crimes. This will lead to a safer society for everyone.

The death penalty is a relic of the past. It is an ineffective, irreversible, and cruel punishment. It belongs on the scrapheap of history.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer