Field Experience D: Application of Content

No Evidence 0.00% 2 Nominal Evidence 69.00% 3 Unacceptable Evidence 74.00% 4 Acceptable Evidence 87.00% 5 Target Evidence 100.00% 70.0 % Content 40.0 % Reflections on Application of Content [InTASC: 5; CEC 3] No submission. Reflection does not relate to the assignment. Reflection does not apply knowledge, skills, and/or tools across concepts and/or content areas to engage students in critical thinking and/or problem solving on local and/or global issues in an acceptable manner. Adequate reflection on applying knowledge, skills, and tools across concepts and content areas to engage students in critical thinking and problem solving on local and global issues in an acceptable manner is provided. Thorough reflection on applying knowledge, skills, and tools across concepts and content areas to engage students in critical thinking and problem solving on local and global issues is provided. 70.0 % Content 30.0 % Application of Conclusions to Practice [InTASC: 5, 9; CEC 3, 6] No submission. Responses on applying conclusions to practice are not related to assignment. Responses on applying conclusions to practice are unclear or under-developed. Application of conclusions drawn reflects development as a professional. Application of conclusions drawn reflects development as a professional with an awareness of the needs of students, parents, and community. 20.0 % Organization and Effectiveness 20.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) No submission. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 10.0 %Format 10.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 100 % Total Weightage