Examine Response to Intervention (RTI) and Evidence-Based Practices (EBP) and examine at least 3 Evidence-Based Practices that can be used in RTI settings. RTI settings allow for a lot of room related to program delivery, so you should be able to examine how RTI and EBP are connected in real-life classrooms. You should also examine the role of evidence-based practices and the criteria that you used to determine if these interventions were adequately vetted classroom practices. This paper is not to be lengthy - a maximum of 5 pages (not including references; an abstract is not needed). The assignment rubric will be used for this assignment, but feedback will be in comments about your submission. This paper should reflect the professional literature, not your opinion.
Examine Response to Intervention (RTI) and Evidence-Based Practices (EBP)
Full Answer Section
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier framework designed to provide high-quality instruction and intervention to all students, identify students at risk for academic or behavioral difficulties, and prevent the need for more intensive services, including special education. Rooted in the reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 2004, RTI shifts the focus from a "wait-to-fail" model to one of early identification and prevention (National Center on Response to Intervention, n.d.). The core of the RTI model is its tiered structure, typically comprising three levels:- Tier 1: Universal, Core Instruction: This tier involves high-quality, research-based instruction delivered to all students in the general education classroom. It includes differentiated instruction and universal screening to identify students who may be struggling. The goal is to meet the needs of approximately 80-85% of the student population.
- Tier 2: Targeted, Supplemental Intervention: For students who do not respond adequately to Tier 1 instruction, Tier 2 provides small-group, targeted interventions in addition to core instruction. These interventions are more intensive, focused on specific skill deficits, and typically delivered for a limited duration (e.g., 10-12 weeks). Progress monitoring is frequent to assess responsiveness. This tier aims to support an additional 10-15% of students.
- Tier 3: Intensive, Individualized Intervention: Students who show minimal or no progress in Tier 2 receive highly individualized, intensive interventions. This tier often involves one-on-one or very small group instruction, longer durations, and highly frequent progress monitoring. Students at this tier may eventually be referred for a comprehensive evaluation for special education services if they continue to demonstrate insufficient response to intervention.