Prompt: Briefly explain both the Kantian and Utilitarian theories of right action. How are they
different? Which theory offers better answers to questions concerning what we ought, and ought not, to do? Why? What does the theory you prefer get right that the other theory gets wrong?
How would someone who disagrees with you attempt to refute your argument, and how would you respond? Or, is neither theory satisfactory? Why? What might a satisfactory theory look like?
Consider a relevant and strong counter-argument.
I have provided you the rough draft of my paper, the paper limit is 5 pages long and I still missing
introduction and conclusion. My require for you is
- adding introduction and conclusion on my paper
- edit my body paragraph because I know it is wordy
- correct my grammar error because I have a lot of them, I am an international student
the thesis is highlighted in yellow and the topic sentence of each body paragraph is in blue.
also, the source I use is given at the last page of the attached file