EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Today’s HR professionals are expected to measure the success or failure of HR practices based on the achievement of organizational outcomes. Brand identity, bottom-line profitability, employee job satisfaction, and increased management focus are all outcomes that can be achieved in part through an organization’s total rewards program.
This case examines a fictitious M. K. Makey organization and how it aligns its total rewards programs with its organizational goals and values.
Read the The Makey Case.

You have been asked to write an opinion piece for a local newspaper in which you address the following:

  1. Analyze the practice of companies offering their own products to enhance the total compensation of its employees.
  2. Is this a common practice in U.S. organizations? Give real-life examples (employers by name). In your educated opinion, do you think this is a good idea? Why or why not?
  3. Make recommendations regarding an expansion of the benefits programs offered at Makey’s. Justify your recommendations with outside sources.

Full Answer Section

            From an organizational standpoint, this practice offers several advantages. Firstly, it can be a cost-effective benefit. For companies with high marginal profit on their products or excess capacity in their services, providing these to employees might incur a lower direct cost than offering an equivalent cash bonus or a third-party benefit. Secondly, it acts as a powerful internal marketing tool. Employees who regularly use and enjoy the company's products become authentic brand ambassadors. Their firsthand experience can foster deeper loyalty, provide valuable informal feedback, and enhance their understanding of the customer's perspective. This can lead to improved product quality and service delivery. Thirdly, it can reinforce company culture and identity, particularly for organizations whose products are central to their mission or lifestyle (e.g., outdoor gear companies, tech firms). However, there are also potential downsides. The perceived value of such benefits can be highly subjective. An employee who doesn't use the product or service may see it as less valuable than a cash equivalent or a more universally applicable benefit. There's also the risk of over-saturation or perceived lack of choice, where employees might prefer flexibility in their benefits rather than being tied to company-specific offerings. Furthermore, if the product or service itself is not highly regarded, offering it as a benefit could inadvertently undermine employee morale or even the company's brand internally. Commonality in U.S. Organizations and My Opinion This practice is indeed a common and often celebrated perk in many U.S. organizations, particularly within certain industries.
  • Technology Companies: Firms like Google famously offer free meals, on-site fitness centers, and even transportation services to their employees, leveraging their campus infrastructure to enhance convenience and well-being.
  • Retailers: Starbucks provides free coffee and food benefits to its partners (employees), fostering a deep connection to the brand's core product. Similarly, many apparel retailers offer substantial employee discounts on their clothing lines.
  • Automotive Industry: Employees at companies like Ford or General Motors often receive significant discounts on vehicle purchases or leases, directly connecting their work to the end product.
  • Hospitality/Travel: Major hotel chains like Marriott or airlines like Delta frequently offer discounted stays or travel benefits to their employees, allowing them to experience the services they help provide.
In my educated opinion, offering company products or services as part of total compensation can be a very good idea, but with crucial caveats. When executed thoughtfully, it aligns employee interests with organizational success, fostering a sense of pride and ownership. It leverages the company's unique assets in a way that generic benefits cannot. For instance, a software engineer at a tech company might genuinely value access to cutting-edge internal tools or a free subscription to their company's premium service, as it deepens their understanding and connection to their work. However, the key lies in balance and perceived value. These in-kind benefits should ideally complement, not replace, a competitive base salary and a robust core benefits package (health insurance, retirement plans). They are most effective when the product or service is genuinely desirable to a significant portion of the workforce and when its provision is managed efficiently to avoid administrative burdens. If the benefit feels like a forced consumption of company goods rather than a genuine perk, or if it's seen as a substitute for fair cash compensation, it can backfire. The best programs offer these in-kind benefits in addition to a comprehensive and flexible total rewards strategy that acknowledges diverse employee needs. Recommendations for Expansion of Benefits Programs at Makey's Assuming M. K. Makey currently offers some form of product-based compensation, I recommend expanding their benefits program to create a more holistic and competitive total rewards package, focusing on areas that enhance employee well-being, professional development, and financial security. These recommendations are justified by external research on best practices in total rewards.
  1. Enhanced Health & Wellness Programs:
    • Recommendation: Beyond standard health insurance, introduce comprehensive wellness initiatives. This could include on-site or subsidized gym memberships, mental health support services (e.g., Employee Assistance Programs with counseling), nutritional counseling, and stress management workshops.
    • Justification: A study by the American Psychological Association (2023) consistently shows that workplace stress and mental health concerns are significant issues impacting productivity and retention. Investing in holistic well-being programs demonstrates a genuine concern for employees, leading to higher job satisfaction and reduced absenteeism. Companies like Google and Johnson & Johnson are leaders in this space, recognizing that healthy employees are more engaged and productive.
  2. Flexible Work Arrangements:
    • Recommendation: Implement flexible scheduling options, such as compressed workweeks, flextime, or hybrid remote work models where feasible.
    • Justification: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the demand for flexibility. Research from Gallup (2022) indicates that employees with flexible work options report higher engagement, lower burnout, and greater overall well-being. This benefit is particularly attractive for attracting and retaining diverse talent, including parents and caregivers, and can significantly boost work-life balance, directly impacting job satisfaction.
  3. Professional Development and Upskilling Opportunities:
    • Recommendation: Establish a robust program for continuous learning, including tuition reimbursement for relevant courses, access to online learning platforms (e.g., Coursera, LinkedIn Learning), internal mentorship programs, and opportunities for cross-functional training.
    • Justification: In a rapidly evolving market, employees highly value opportunities for growth. A report by PwC (2023) highlights that employees are increasingly seeking employers who invest in their skills development, viewing it as crucial for career progression. This not only enhances employee loyalty and retention but also builds a more skilled and adaptable workforce for Makey's, contributing directly to increased management focus and organizational agility.
  4. Financial Wellness Programs:
    • Recommendation: Offer financial literacy workshops, access to financial advisors, and potentially matching contributions to retirement savings plans (e.g., 401(k) or local equivalents).
    • Justification: Financial stress is a major concern for many employees, impacting their focus and productivity. A survey by Fidelity Investments (2023) found that employees who feel financially well are more engaged and productive. Providing resources to improve financial literacy and security demonstrates a commitment to employees' long-term well-being, enhancing their overall job satisfaction and reducing turnover

Sample Answer

        Opinion Piece: Beyond the Paycheck – The Value of In-Kind Benefits in Employee Compensation By [Your Name/Title], Division Controller, TransGlobal Airlines In today's competitive talent landscape, human resources professionals are increasingly tasked with demonstrating the tangible impact of their practices on organizational outcomes. A robust total rewards program, encompassing not just salary but a comprehensive suite of benefits, is pivotal to achieving goals like enhanced brand identity, improved profitability, and, crucially, elevated employee job satisfaction. One intriguing, yet often debated, aspect of total compensation is the practice of companies offering their own products or services to employees. This approach, while seemingly straightforward, carries unique implications for both the employer and the workforce.
The Practice of Offering Company Products as Compensation The practice of companies providing their own products or services as part of an employee's total compensation package is a fascinating blend of benefit and brand reinforcement. At its core, it's an in-kind benefit, where value is delivered not as cash, but as access to what the company produces or sells. This can range from discounted goods and free services to direct allowances for company-specific offerings.