Dysfunctional beliefs about drugs, oneself, and about one’s “relationship” with drugs.

Full Answer Section

        Checks and Balances:

• Federalist Paper No. 51: Written by James Madison, this paper emphasized the importance of checks and balances. Each branch of government would have the power to check the excesses of the others, preventing concentrated power.
• The Constitution: Articles I-III outline the checks and balances system. The legislative branch can override vetoes with a supermajority (Article I, Section 7), the Senate can confirm presidential appointments and approve treaties (Article II, Section 2), and the Supreme Court can declare laws unconstitutional through judicial review (Marbury v. Madison, 1803).

Relationship to Hudson's (2020) "Models of Democracy":

• Federalist Papers: These writings reflect a preference for a representative democracy (indirect democracy) with checks and balances, similar to Hudson's model. This system prioritizes stability and prevents the "tyranny of the majority."
• Centinel No. 1: This Anti-Federalist paper expresses concerns about a powerful central government and a potential disconnect from the will of the people. It aligns with a more direct democracy model where citizens have a greater say in decision-making.

Current Example:

• Federal vs. State Marijuana Laws: The federal government classifies marijuana as a Schedule I drug, but some states have legalized it for recreational or medical use. This tension between federal and state authority reflects the ongoing debate between centralized power and state autonomy.

Importance for Public Policy and Administration Leaders: Understanding the Federalist/Anti-Federalist debate is crucial for leaders in public policy and administration for several reasons:

• Balancing National and Local Needs: Leaders must navigate the federal system, considering both national goals and the needs of individual states.
• Understanding Constitutional Constraints: A grasp of the Constitution's structure and limitations helps leaders craft policies and programs that fall within their authority.
• Anticipating Public Concerns: The Federalist/Anti-Federalist debate highlights the ongoing tension between centralized power and individual rights. Understanding these concerns allows leaders to develop policies that are more likely to gain public acceptance.

By studying these historical debates, leaders can develop a deeper understanding of the American political system and make informed decisions that serve the public good.  

Sample Answer

     

Capturing the Spirit of Federalist/Anti-Federalist Debate in the Constitution

1. Federalism and Separation of Powers:

• Federalist Papers: Federalist No. 10, written by James Madison, argued for a federal system to prevent tyranny. A strong central government could address national issues while respecting state autonomy.
• The Constitution: The Constitution establishes a federal system with a national government and state governments, each with specific powers (Article I, Section 8). The separation of powers (Article I, II, and III) further distributes power, preventing any one branch from becoming too powerful.