Discuss how community nurses can use social inclusion and primary health care principles to protect and promote health for people at risk of exposure to HIV and for  people living with HIV/AIDs.

  According to the World Health Organisation, “... the vulnerabilities [for people living with HIV/AIDS] result in their being disproportionately affected by HIV in all countries and settings. These disproportionate risks reflect...specific legal and social issues that increase their vulnerability. Yet HIV services for key populations remain largely inadequate” (WHO, 2016, pxv) Assignment question: Discuss how community nurses can use social inclusion and primary health care principles to protect and promote health for people at risk of exposure to HIV and for people living with HIV/AIDs. 1. Include a summary of social inclusion and primary health care 
2. Include a description of discrimination and stigma issues affecting people at risk of 
exposure to HIV and people living with HIV/AIDs 
3. Include Case Scenario 3 HIV, in your 
discussion as an example of community nursing interventions and approaches to support health promotion and social inclusion for people at risk of exposure to HIV and for people living with HIV/AIDs. 
World Health Organisation (2016). Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations. Geneva: WHO. (www.who.int) Unit learning outcomes and Deakin Graduate Learning Outcomes This assessment task provides you with the opportunity to demonstrate the following Unit Learning outcomes and Deakin Graduate Learning Outcomes; Unit Learning Outcomes 1. Explain the relationship between nursing, the social determinants of health, and primary health care; 
2. Identify the roles and responsibilities of the nurse engaged in community health practice, including education of individuals, families, and carers; 
3. Evaluate symptoms, functional status, and risk in the management of individuals, significant others and communities; 
4. Identify participative, evidence-based health promoting interventions for individuals, families, and carers from diverse backgrounds 
Deakin Graduate Learning Outcomes 1. Discipline specific knowledge and capabilities: appropriate to the level of study related to a discipline or profession 
2. Communication: using oral, written and interpersonal communication to inform, motivate and affect change 
3. Critical thinking: evaluating information using critical and analytical thinking and judgement 
4. Problem-solving: creating solutions to authentic (real world and ill-defined) problems 
Submission information: This assignment task is to be submitted into the designated assessment dropbox for this unit. Due date: Monday 16thOctober 2017– assignment to be submitted no later than 11.59pm. To ensure appropriate support is available should any technical issues arise, you are strongly advised to submit your assignment into the designated dropbox before 4pm on the due date. You are responsible for ensuring that the correct version of your assessment task is properly uploaded into the correct assessment dropbox. Student instructions for assessment task 4. Include a summary of social inclusion within primary health care 
5. Include a description of discrimination and stigma issues affecting people at risk of 
exposure to HIV and people living with HIV/AIDs 
6. Include Case Scenario 3 HIV, available on CloudDeakin for HNN 217, in your 
discussion as an example of community nursing interventions and approaches to support social inclusion and health promotion for people at risk of exposure to HIV and for people living with HIV/AIDs. 
Review the content and resources you have been provided with in the unit. Use relevant literature to support your discussion. These references may include relevant chapters from the list of prescribed and recommended texts for the unit HNN 217 as noted in the unit guide for T2 2017, on the Cloud site for the unit, and journal articles from peer reviewed journals. You may use Scenario 3 HIV re a global focus, an Australian focus, or both if you wish. You do not need to reference the scenario. Do not describe the pathophysiology of HIV/AIDS. Check your assignment against the assignment question and marking rubric prior to submission to ensure you have addressed all of the requirements. Presentation: Front page: to include student name and number, Assignment title and word count. Adhere to word limit requirements (within 10%). The word count does not include headings, references page, reference citations and direct quotes. A reference list should be provided on a separate page headed ‘References’ at the end of the assignment. Do not use headings
Specific presentation requirements as per APA style guide. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.apastyle.org Font: 12-point type size (never use a larger point size for headings or on the title page). Use Times or Times New Roman. Spacing: Double-line spacing (Do not insert extra lines between paragraphs or the references list entries.) Use one space after all punctuation except certain periods within abbreviations, quotations or parentheses (e.g., p.m.; "et al., 2014"). Page numbers Page numbers to be provided on all pages except front page. Place page number in top right hand corner Margins
2.54 cm at the top, bottom, left-hand, and right-hand sides of the page. Paragraph indents Indent the first line of each paragraph (using the tab key or paragraph tool). Exceptions: abstract, block quotations, titles and headings, table titles and notes. References list indents Apply the hanging indent for the second and subsequent lines of a reference. Justification of text All text needs to be aligned to the left, not justified Your assignment should be converted to a PDF document before submission. Please check the document before submitting to the dropbox to ensure the formatting has not changed. Software for converting word documents to PDF is available to download from the Deakin software catalogue at no cost. Structure:
Must contain a purposeful introduction that outlines some general background to the topic, an aim and purpose and themes for discussion. The body of the assignment will constitute about 80% of the word limit and provide key arguments supported by literature. The body of the assignment is normally organised in paragraphs of approximately 150 words with each paragraph focused on explanation of one idea. There should be a logical progression of ideas as demonstrated by logically linked arguments/discussion made in each paragraph. Each paragraph should commence with a topic sentence and end with a link to the next paragraph, and show a logical progression of ideas/argument. The conclusion paragraph should provide a summation of ideas, draw together the discussion, present no new material (references are not expected in the conclusion paragraph) and offer your position drawn from the discussion. Communicate using academic writing:
Adheres to conventions of written English eg. word choice, professional language, grammar, use of appropriate sentence structure, punctuation and spelling. Use of direct quotations: unless really necessary, most assignments do not require the use of direct quotes. Instead, re-expression of author arguments into your own words is required. If a direct quotation is used, you must explain how it adds to the discussion. Referencing style Performance High Distinction Distinction Credit Standards  Criterion 1 Identifies and explains the relationships between social determinants of health, primary health care, and health and well- being of populations and communities at risk of exposure to HIV and for people living with HIV/AIDs (30 marks) ULO 1 All elements of this criterion met with occasional minor errors/gaps (24-30 marks)    All elements of this criterion met with several minor knowledge errors /gap(21-23 marks)    Most elements of this criterion met but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error (18-20 marks)        Meets most elements of the criterion but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps (15-17 marks)   Does not demonstrate understanding of the relationships between social determinants of health and primary health care and/or health and well-being of populations and communities at risk of exposure to HIV. (<15 marks) Criterion 2 Identifies and evaluates evidence- based risk management and health promotion interventions for populations and communities at risk of exposure to HIV and for people living with HIV/AIDs (40 marks) ULO 2, 3, 4 All elements of this criterion met with occasional minor errors/gaps (32-40 marks)   All elements of this criterion met with several minor knowledge errors /gap(28-31 marks)   Most elements of this criterion met but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error (24-27 marks)     Meets most elements of the criterion but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps (20-23 marks)   Does not demonstrate understanding of risk management for populations and communities at risk of HIV exposure by not providing required health promoting interventions and /or not providing supporting evidence. (<20 marks) Relevant literature selected and used to support discussion (10 marks) All elements of this criterion met with occasional minor errors/gaps (8-10 marks)      All elements of this criterion met with several minor knowledge errors /gap(7 marks)    Most elements of this criterion met but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error (6 marks)     Meets most elements of the criterion but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps (5 marks)   Literature selected was either irrelevant or inadequate and/ or not used/rarely used to support discussion (<5 marks)  Referencing style is accurate and consistent with APA style (10 marks) All elements of this criterion met with occasional minor errors/gaps (8-10 marks)     All elements of this criterion met with several minor knowledge errors gap (7 marks)   Most elements of this criterion met but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error (6 marks)     Meets most elements of the criterion but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps (5 marks)   Consistently incorrect referencing style (<5 marks) Assignment is presented and structured according to instructions. AND Writing is in accordance with standard language conventions (10 marks)   All elements of the criteria met with occasional minor errors/gaps (8-10 marks)   All elements of the criteria met with several minor errors/gaps (7 marks)   All elements of the criteria met but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error (6 marks)     All elements of the criteria met but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps Errors in grammar, sentence and / or punctuation which detract from readability at times (5 marks)   Not presented according to instructions. Lacks expected structure. Multiple errors in spelling/grammar and/or punctuation that significantly detracts from readability throughout.