Director of Athletics at an NCAA institution

Pretend you are the Director of Athletics at an NCAA institution. The NCAA allows self-reporting of violations but can be reported or investigated by the association or other member institutions. If you were aware of a minor violation by your cross country team for providing added benefits to your participants from a booster, would you report it or hope that no one else found out and handle it in-house? Additionally, the NAIA is a self-reporting association so institutions self-report any violations rather than investigations from the NAIA until a self-report occurs. Would being a member of the NAIA change your response? Is the decision you made ethical? (Your initial post should be between 150-200 words

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

As the Director of Athletics, I must report the violation regardless of the NCAA or NAIA membership. Here’s why:

  • Integrity and Compliance: Failing to report the violation undermines the integrity of the athletic program and puts the institution at risk of harsher penalties if discovered later.
  • Protecting Student-Athletes: The NCAA and NAIA rules exist to ensure fair competition and protect student-athletes from exploitation. Reporting the violation safeguards these principles.
  • Transparency and Trust: Building trust with the NCAA/NAIA and fostering an environment of transparency is crucial for the long-term success of the athletic program.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

Membership doesn’t change the ethical nature of the decision. Both the NCAA and NAIA prioritize fair play and ethical conduct. Self-reporting allows for a more controlled and potentially less severe outcome.

Handling it internally without reporting is unethical. Ignoring the violation puts the program at risk of major sanctions and tarnishes the institution’s reputation.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer