• Examine digital threats in the context of information security and compliance.
• Examine how the internet is used for cybercrime, cyber-stalking, and other abusive behaviors.
• Discuss the various laws used to secure the USA and other countries from the threat of terror.
• Recognize the agencies responsible for the investigation of terror and warfare in online spaces.
Overview
The continuing evolution of human behavior as a result of technological innovations has created unparalleled opportunities for crime and misuse. Over the past three decades, there has been a substantive increase in the use of technology by street criminals and novel applications of technology to create new forms of crime that did not previously exist. Warfare as we know it seems to be shifting from physical to cyber warfare, with Nation states attacking each other’s technology infrastructure via the web.
- Traditionally, the military is equipped to handle physical war. Who is better equipped to handle cyberwarfare?
- On what legal grounds can a nation attack another in the context of cyberwarfare? What jurisdictional challenges do you foresee when enforcing the law when it comes to cyberwarfare?
- Identify and discuss four typologies of cybercrime, including what intelligence gathering might look like for these cybercrimes.
Action Items
- create a post with a minimum 350 words that share the following:
•
o Traditionally, the Military is equipped to handle physical war. Who is better equipped to handle cyberwarfare?
o On what legal grounds can a nation attack another in the context of cyberwarfare? What jurisdictional challenges do you foresee when enforcing the law when it comes to cyberwarfare?
o Identify and discuss four typologies of cybercrime, including what intelligence gathering might look like for these cybercrimes.
Full Answer Section
In general, however, it is becoming increasingly clear that the military is not the only, or even the best, equipped to handle cyberwarfare. In fact, many experts believe that a more effective approach is to rely on a combination of military, law enforcement, and civilian expertise.
The military has a number of advantages when it comes to cyberwarfare. They have access to sophisticated technology and training, and they are familiar with the principles of warfare. However, they also have a number of disadvantages. They are often slow to adapt to new technologies, and they can be bureaucratic and inflexible.
Law enforcement agencies also have a number of advantages when it comes to cyberwarfare. They have experience investigating crimes, and they have access to a variety of legal tools. However, they also have a number of disadvantages. They are often understaffed and underfunded, and they may not have the expertise or resources to deal with sophisticated cyber attacks.
Civilian experts, such as computer scientists and security experts, have a number of advantages when it comes to cyberwarfare. They are often at the forefront of new technologies, and they have a deep understanding of how cyber systems work. However, they also have a number of disadvantages. They may not have the same level of training or experience as the military or law enforcement, and they may not be familiar with the legal and political considerations involved in cyberwarfare.
On what legal grounds can a nation attack another in the context of cyberwarfare?
The legal grounds for a nation to attack another in the context of cyberwarfare are complex and evolving. There is no single international law that specifically addresses cyberwarfare, and the laws that do exist are often ambiguous or outdated.
In general, however, a nation can only attack another nation in self-defense. This means that the attacker must have a reasonable belief that they are under imminent threat of attack, and that the attack is necessary to defend themselves.
The use of cyberwarfare to achieve political or economic goals is not generally considered to be legal. However, there is some debate about this issue, and it is possible that the laws governing cyberwarfare will evolve in the future.
What jurisdictional challenges do you foresee when enforcing the law when it comes to cyberwarfare?
Enforcing the law when it comes to cyberwarfare is a challenging task. This is because cyber attacks can be launched from anywhere in the world, and it can be difficult to track down the attackers.
In addition, the laws that govern cyberwarfare vary from country to country. This can make it difficult to prosecute cyber attacks that cross international borders.
Another challenge is that cyber attacks often target civilian infrastructure, such as power grids and communication networks. This can make it difficult to distinguish between cyber attacks that are intended to cause harm and those that are simply intended to disrupt or inconvenience.
Identify and discuss four typologies of cybercrime, including what intelligence gathering might look like for these cybercrimes.
There are many different types of cybercrime, but some of the most common include:
- Cyber theft: This involves stealing money or other valuable information from individuals or organizations.
- Cyber vandalism: This involves damaging or destroying computer systems or networks.
- Cyber extortion: This involves threatening to release sensitive information or disrupt computer systems unless a ransom is paid.
Sample Answer
Traditionally, the military is equipped to handle physical war. However, cyberwarfare is a new and evolving threat that requires a different set of skills and expertise.
Who is better equipped to handle cyberwarfare?
There is no single answer to this question, as the best way to handle cyberwarfare depends on a number of factors, such as the specific goals of the attacker, the resources available to the defender, and the legal and political considerations involved.