Different leadership styles

If a leader uses a different leadership style with each of his followers, how might that lead to perceptions of favoritism? What could a leader do to avoid such impressions while still being adaptable to follower needs?
To address this question effectively, students need to draw on insights from our readings in Chapters 5, 6, and Chapter 15, and integrate their personal experiences.

Full Answer Section

     
  • Demotivation: Followers who feel overlooked or not receiving the leadership style they need may become disengaged and less productive. (Chapter 6: Motivation and Job Satisfaction)
  • Loss of Trust: Perceived favoritism can damage trust in the leader's fairness and judgment, hindering open communication and collaboration. (Chapter 5: Communication)
Strategies for Adaptable Leadership without Favoritism:
  • Transparency: Clearly communicate the rationale behind leadership approaches. Explain how different styles cater to specific needs or tasks, ensuring everyone feels valued and supported.
  • Strengths-Based Approach: Identify individual strengths and tailor leadership styles to empower followers to leverage their best qualities. This ensures everyone feels challenged and has opportunities to shine.
  • Focus on Shared Goals: Despite using different styles, emphasize the team's shared goals and objectives. This fosters a sense of unity and purpose that transcends individual interactions with the leader.
  • Regular Feedback: Provide regular and constructive feedback to all followers, ensuring everyone feels heard and has opportunities for growth. (Chapter 6: Motivation and Job Satisfaction)
  • Open Communication: Encourage open communication so followers feel comfortable discussing their needs and preferences for leadership styles.
  • Leadership Development: Invest in leadership development programs that equip leaders with the skills to adapt their styles effectively while maintaining fairness and consistency.
Personal Experience Integration: Reflecting on my own experiences, I've seen the negative impact of favoritism firsthand. In a previous group project, a leader consistently provided more support and direction to a specific member, fostering resentment among others. This ultimately led to decreased collaboration and poorer project outcomes. However, I've also witnessed adaptable leadership done well. My current supervisor uses a combination of coaching and delegating styles, tailoring her approach based on individual project needs and team member strengths. This leads to a more engaged and productive work environment where everyone feels valued and supported. Conclusion: Effective leadership requires adaptability. However, leaders must strive to strike a balance, utilizing different styles strategically while maintaining a perception of fairness. By focusing on transparency, strengths-based approaches, shared goals, and open communication, leaders can build trust and achieve success while avoiding the pitfalls of favoritism.  

Sample Answer

     

A leader who employs different leadership styles with each follower can create perceptions of favoritism, eroding trust and team cohesion. Here's why, drawing on insights from our readings and potential solutions:

Favoritism and its Pitfalls:

  • Equity Concerns: Followers may perceive the leader as biased, creating resentment towards those receiving preferential treatment (Chapter 15: Power, Influence, and Politics). This can breed a competitive and unproductive work environment.