David Ingram, The Subject of Justice in Postmodern Discourse: Aesthetic Judgment and Political Rationality, in HABERMAS AND THE UNFINISHED PROJECT OF MODERNITY:

David Ingram, The Subject of Justice in Postmodern Discourse: Aesthetic Judgment and Political Rationality, in HABERMAS AND THE UNFINISHED PROJECT OF MODERNITY: CRITICAL ESSAYS ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL DISCOURSE OF MODERNITY The theme for this presentation is based on; -Jurgen Habermas: Global Justice through Global Constitution, on the Philosophy, Legal, Human Rights and Social aspects of everyday life. -Using the only the book,HABERMAS AND THE UNFINISHED PROJECT OF MODERNITY: CRITICAL ESSAYS ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL DISCOURSE OF MODERNITY (Maurizio Passerin d'Entr~ves & Seyla Benhabib eds. 1997) (pg 269-297) --read and present David Ingrams argument in the The Subject of Justice in Postmodern Discourse: Aesthetic Judgment and Political Rationality, starting from page 269- 297 -Write an original Presentation making sure that the work clear cut and understandable to those who may have no background on the work of David Ingram -Presentation begins with a quote(s) from the readings and again during the presentation 0.5 -If a book is presented, a brief information about the author and the style by which author present the idea 0.5 -What are the questions of the book that presentation tends to answer? 0.5 -What is the hypothesis or thesis statement advanced by the author(s)? 1 -Whether you agree with the thesis advanced by the author. Argument 1 -Demonstrating a full knowledge of the theme by answering all questions with explanations and elaboration. 1 -Critical approach in presentation 1 -Organization of presentation: Presenting the major themes of the book in a way that audience can follow 1 -Ideas delivered in a clear and concise manner, without depending too much on notes. 1 Be sure to point out the main themes,such as -What is davids main objective > problems > goals --what is davids solution > what do you think or may some other philosopher think (comparison) --are their any new ideas? (agree or disagree) --make sure to ask a question at the end that will bring about a discussion Compare the David Ingram reading to the thesis statement in the Citizenship reading (Agree/disagree, why, use new ideas from the david ingram reading to illustrate your answer) #1> READ: David Ingram, â?œThe Subject of Justice in Postmodern Discourse: Aesthetic Judgment and Political Rationality,â? in Maurizio Passerin d'Entrèves, Seyla Benhabib ed., Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: Critical Essays on the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (MIT Press, 1997), pp. 269-302. #2> Demonstrating a full knowledge of the theme (briefly summarize) by answering all questions with explanations and elaboration. (very brief) #3>-Critical approach in presentation (comparing the major theme David Ingrams book in response to Jurgen Haberms position on citizenship) #4>-Using the thesis statement On page 294 of Jurgen Haberms, �Ã?¢Ã¯Ã?¿Ã? ½Ã¯Ã?¿Ã?½Citizenship and National Identity,�Ã? ¢Ã¯Ã?¿Ã?½Ã¯Ã?¿Ã?½ in Thomas Pogge and Darrel Moellendorf ed., Global Justice: Seminal Essays, (Paragon House, 2008) pp. 285-310 #4>ïƒ Do you agree with the thesis of the author (using The Subject of Justice in Postmodern Discourse reading) as the only structure for whether your agree or disagree, why? Use examples what is being most argued from the David ingram reading as your analysis. Second Part: Compare the David Ingram reading with the 3 questions (what would the reading have to say? Use examples/ bring out new ideas that the article expands on) How would The Subject of Justice in Postmodern Discourse answer the following questions (think about rational potential, language games, incommensurable, cultures, aesthetic judgement) 1. Do foreigners have the same duties, entitlements, and legal protections as native citizens? 2. Is it morally justifiable to live in a political community that gives outsiders exactly the same rights as insiders? 3. Should there be open immigration or should there be restrictions on immigration in relation to immigration models like Canada and the US. PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)