A. Provide a summary of the current security weaknesses outlined in the attached Independent Security Report.
B. Create mitigation plans to remediate the security gaps identified in the Independent Security Report, ensuring alignment with PCI DSS and GDPR standards.
C. Specify three essential security roles that must be hired to satisfy compliance, risk management, and governance needs, and define the responsibilities of each position using the NICE Framework referenced in the Independent Security Report.
D. Identify at least three physical security threats or vulnerabilities and at least three logical threats or vulnerabilities, and explain how each one affects the organization’s overall security posture based on the Company Overview and the Independent Security Report.
E. Build a cybersecurity awareness training program that adheres to NIST guidelines and includes:
Annual mandatory training
Role-specific or specialized training
Ongoing awareness efforts
F. Summarize the required standards for protecting organizational assets, including policies for acceptable use, mobile devices, password management, and safeguarding PII, referencing regulatory or contractual requirements as evidence.
G. Create an incident response plan consistent with the Independent Security Report and structured around the four NIST-defined incident handling phases.
H. Develop a business continuity plan (BCP) that addresses natural disaster risks cited in the Independent Security Report, incorporating:
Project scoping and planning
Business impact analysis
Continuity strategy development
Plan approval and implementation
Sample Answer
Data Links: The core approach is to equip public health professionals with the skills to link environmental hazard data (e.g., air quality, water quality) with health outcome data (e.g., asthma, cancer). This aligns with HP2030 goals like EH-01: Reduce the number of days people are exposed to unhealthy air and EH-03: Reduce per capita water consumption.
Surveillance Capacity: The training emphasizes the use of the EPHT Network's tools and data visualizations, thereby strengthening the surveillance capacity of state and local health departments. This allows jurisdictions to monitor progress toward HP2030 benchmarks and identify areas where environmental policies are failing to protect populations.
Risk Communication: The program often includes modules on how to interpret and effectively communicate tracking data to the public and policymakers, supporting the HP2030 aim of increasing public awareness of environmental risks.
2. Effectiveness in Meeting Environmental Health Policy Requirements
The EPHT training is highly effective in meeting the operational requirements stemming from various environmental health policies, though it does not set policy itself.
Data Mandates: Federal environmental health policies (e.g., Clean Air Act, Safe Drinking Water Act) mandate rigorous monitoring and reporting. The EPHT training provides the necessary technical proficiency to handle the large, complex datasets required for compliance reporting, risk assessment, and policy evaluation (e.g., analyzing the impact of a pollution control measure).
Interagency Collaboration: The training promotes a standardized data language and platform for sharing information across different agencies (e.g., EPA, state environmental agencies, local health departments). This standardization is essential for policies that require multi-jurisdictional cooperation to track contaminants and manage regional health crises.
Evidence-Based Practice: By training users to apply epidemiological methods to environmental data, the program ensures that policy recommendations and interventions developed at the local level are evidence-based and scientifically defensible.
3. Program Design and Audience Needs
The EPHT training program is generally well-designed to meet the needs of its intended audience: state and local public health staff, epidemiologists, and environmental health specialists.