Current change management theories.

  1. Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history.
  2. Analyze in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed.
  3. Formulate three valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories.
  4. Appraise the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization's readiness for change. Propose two diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Defend why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization.
  5. Using one of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization's readiness for change.
    o Provide results of the diagnostic analysis
    o Explain the results
  6. Interpret whether or not the organization is ready for change. Substantiate your conclusion by referencing current change management theories.

Full Answer Section

    Current HR Practice, Policy, Process, or Procedure for Change Current Practice: The company's current HR performance management system is a traditional annual review process. Employees are evaluated on their performance against preset goals and objectives. Proposed Change: Implement a continuous performance management system. This system would provide employees with more frequent feedback and coaching, and would allow them to set and track their own goals. Rationale for Change
  1. Alignment with current change management theories: Continuous performance management is aligned with current change management theories that emphasize the importance of employee engagement, empowerment, and feedback.
  2. Improved employee performance: Studies have shown that continuous performance management systems can lead to improved employee performance. This is because employees who receive more frequent feedback and coaching are more likely to be engaged and motivated in their work.
  3. Increased retention: Continuous performance management systems can also help to increase employee retention. This is because employees who feel that they are being developed and supported are more likely to stay with the company.
Diagnostic Tools for Assessing Organizational Readiness for Change Diagnostic Tool 1: Force Field Analysis A force field analysis is a tool that can be used to identify the forces that are for and against the proposed change. Benefits of Force Field Analysis:
  • Simple to use and understand
  • Can be used to identify potential obstacles to change
  • Can be used to develop strategies for overcoming obstacles
Diagnostic Tool 2: Readiness for Change Assessment A readiness for change assessment is a tool that can be used to assess the organization's level of readiness for change. Benefits of Readiness for Change Assessment:
  • Provides a comprehensive assessment of the organization's readiness for change
  • Can be used to identify areas where the organization needs to improve its readiness for change
  • Can be used to develop a plan for addressing the organization's readiness for change
Assessment of Organizational Readiness for Change Force Field Analysis Results Forces for Change:
  • The company's current performance management system is outdated.
  • Employees are dissatisfied with the current performance management system.
  • Continuous performance management has been shown to be effective in other organizations.
Forces Against Change:
  • The company is risk-averse.
  • There is resistance to change from some employees.
  • The company will need to invest in training and resources to implement a new performance management system.
Explanation of Results The force field analysis suggests that there are some strong forces for change, but there are also some potential obstacles to change. The company will need to carefully consider these forces and obstacles before making a decision about whether or not to implement a continuous performance management system. Readiness for Change Assessment Results The readiness for change assessment suggests that the organization is moderately ready for change. The organization has some of the necessary resources and infrastructure in place to support change, but there is still some work to be done to prepare the organization for a new performance management system. Interpretation of Results Based on the results of the force field analysis and readiness for change assessment, it is somewhat likely that the organization is ready for change. The company has a strong desire to change, and it has some of the necessary resources and infrastructure in place to support change. However, there are still some potential obstacles to change that the company will need to address. Conclusion Overall, the organization is somewhat ready for change. The company has a strong desire to change, and it has some of the necessary resources and infrastructure in place to support change. However, there are still some potential obstacles to change that the company will need to address. The company should carefully consider the results of the diagnostic tools and develop a plan for addressing the organization's readiness for change before making a decision about whether or not to implement a continuous performance management system. Please note that this is just a sample response. The specific tools and analyses used to assess organizational readiness for change will vary depending on the specific organization and the proposed change.  

Sample Answer

 

Company Description

Industry: Technology Size: Large enterprise with over 10,000 employees Number of employees: 10,000+ History: Founded in 1998, the company has grown rapidly to become a leading provider of cloud-based software solutions. The company has a strong culture of innovation and is committed to providing its customers with the latest and greatest technology.