Criminal Law

Carol shoots her father Carl with malice aforethought. He thereafter lingers in a coma for two months and then dies. Carol is in a jurisdiction that recognizes merger for attempt and that also requires a victim to die within one year and a day if the defendant is to be charged with murder. Can Carol be charged with attempted murder and murder? Why or why not?

Full Answer Section

   

Second, the jurisdiction in which the crime occurred would need to have a statute of limitations for murder that is longer than one year and a day. A statute of limitations is a law that sets a time limit within which a criminal prosecution must be brought. In the case of murder, most jurisdictions have a statute of limitations that is longer than one year and a day. This is because murder is considered to be a very serious crime, and prosecutors want to ensure that they have enough time to investigate the crime and gather evidence.

Finally, the facts of the case would need to be considered. In order to be convicted of attempted murder, the prosecution would need to prove that Carol had the specific intent to kill Carl. This means that they would need to show that Carol took steps to try to kill Carl, and that she did so with the knowledge that her actions were likely to result in his death.

In the case of Carol and Carl, it appears that Carol did have the specific intent to kill Carl. She shot him with malice aforethought, which means that she acted with a deliberate and premeditated intent to kill. However, the fact that Carl lingered in a coma for two months before dying may complicate the case. In some jurisdictions, courts have held that the death of the victim must occur within a certain period of time (e.g., one year and a day) after the defendant's actions in order for the defendant to be convicted of murder. This is known as the "year and a day" rule.

In jurisdictions that recognize the "year and a day" rule, it is possible that Carol could be charged with attempted murder but not with murder. This is because Carl did not die within one year and a day of being shot. However, it is also possible that Carol could be convicted of murder, depending on the specific facts of the case and the interpretation of the "year and a day" rule by the court.

For example, in the case of People v. Flores (1988), the California Supreme Court held that the "year and a day" rule does not apply in cases where the defendant's actions set in motion a chain of events that ultimately results in the victim's death. In Flores, the defendant shot the victim, who was then paralyzed from the waist down. The victim developed pressure sores from being confined to a wheelchair, and these pressure sores ultimately led to his death. The court held that the defendant could be convicted of murder, even though the victim did not die within one year and a day of being shot.

In the case of Carol and Carl, it is possible that a court could find that Carol's actions set in motion a chain of events that ultimately resulted in Carl's death. Carol shot Carl, and this caused him to go into a coma. Carl's coma led to pressure sores, and these pressure sores ultimately led to his death. If a court were to find that Carol's actions set in motion this chain of events, it is possible that she could be convicted of murder, even though Carl did not die within one year and a day of being shot.

Ultimately, whether or not Carol could be charged with both attempted murder and murder would depend on the specific laws of the jurisdiction in which the crime occurred and the facts of the case.

Sample Answer

   

Attempted murder and murder are two distinct crimes, and whether or not Carol can be charged with both depends on the specific laws of the jurisdiction in which the crime occurred. In general, attempted murder is defined as the act of trying to kill someone, while murder is defined as the unlawful killing of another human being.

In the case of Carol and Carl, there are a few key factors that would need to be considered in determining whether or not she could be charged with both attempted murder and murder. First, the jurisdiction in which the crime occurred would need to recognize merger for attempt. Merger is a legal doctrine that holds that a defendant cannot be convicted of both an attempt to commit a crime and the completed crime itself. In other words, if Carol is convicted of murder, she cannot also be convicted of attempted murder.