Contract Analysis for Jim and Laura’s Car Purchase

SCENARIO: Jim and Laura Buyer visit the local car dealership because they are interested in buying a new car. The car they currently have is aging and is starting to have mechanical problems. Jim and Laura would share the new car, and use it to go back and forth to work and school. Before going to the dealership, Jim and Laura decide that they can only afford $400.00 a month in car payments.

Once at the car dealership, Jim and Laura meet Stan Salesman. Stan shows them several vehicles and Jim and Laura test-drive several of the cars. Jim and Laura particularly like the blue 4-door sedan. Therefore, they agree to give Stan Salesman a $100.00 deposit to hold the car for a day. Stan Salesman does not give them the receipt but guarantees that the $100.00 is refundable. No documents were signed.

The next day, Stan Salesman calls Jim and Laura to ask them when they would like to take delivery of the car. Jim and Laura, on the way home from the dealership, decided that they were not going to buy the car because they did not want to spend that money each month. Therefore, Jim and Laura tell Stan Salesman that they have decided not to buy the car and request their $100.00 deposit back.

Stan insists that the $100.00 was a deposit on the car and was meant to be part of the contract to buy the car. Stan is very persistent and insistent that Jim and Laura have contracted to buy the car; therefore, the $100.00 will be applied to the purchase price of the car. Jim and Laura are shocked and angry as not only do they not want to spend the money, but now feel as though they are being duped by Stan Salesman.

Jim and Laura have an appointment to see a lawyer in a few days, but know you are a student taking a business law class and come to you for advice. They are very frazzled, and understandably upset that they may have just purchased a car. Since you have been taking business law, you have read and understand the elements of a contract and the defenses to a contract. Therefore, although you are not a lawyer, you provide some basic advice from what you’ve learned in your business law class.

ASSIGNMENT: Advise Jim and Laura based on the above facts as presented and the material covered in the lessons by answering each section in the template below. In this touchstone, be sure to address the following:

Identify the elements that must be present for a legal contract to exist. Define each element using examples.
Determine the facts from the scenario that you will use to support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile.
Decide whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile.
Include two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as quality academic resources.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

Contract Analysis for Jim and Laura’s Car Purchase

Elements of a Legal Contract:

Before analyzing the specific situation, let’s first review the key elements necessary for a valid contract:

  1. Offer and Acceptance: Both parties must express a clear intention to enter into an agreement. An offer needs to be definite and communicated; acceptance requires a clear agreement to the offered terms.
  2. Consideration: Each party must exchange something of value, which can be money, services, or a promise to do something.

Full Answer Section

 

 

  1. Competency:Both parties must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract, meaning they are of legal age and sound mind.
  2. Legal Purpose:The contract’s purpose must be legal and not violate any laws.
  3. Mutual Agreement:Both parties must agree to the same terms without coercion or undue influence.

Analysis of Facts:

Now, let’s examine the relevant facts from the scenario:

  • Jim and Laura expressed interest in buying a car and test-driven several models.
  • They offered a $100 deposit to hold the blue sedan for a day, with Stan verbally guaranteeing its refundability.
  • No written contract or receipt was signed.
  • They later decided not to buy the car and requested their deposit back.
  • Stan claims the deposit was non-refundable and meant to be part of the purchase price.

Decision on Contract Existence:

Based on the elements and the facts presented, several points raise doubt about a valid contract for the car purchase:

  • Missing Written Agreement:Although verbal contracts can be valid, the absence of a written document outlining terms, price, and refundability weakens Stan’s claim.
  • Unclear Mutual Agreement:The deposit’s purpose could be interpreted differently. Jim and Laura considered it refundable for holding the car, while Stan claims it was non-refundable and part of the purchase price. This ambiguity suggests no clear mutual agreement on key terms.
  • Questionable Consideration:While Jim and Laura offered a deposit, it’s unclear if Stan offered anything in return beyond holding the car (which ultimately didn’t occur).

Conclusion:

Due to the absence of a written agreement, unclear mutual understanding, and potential lack of consideration, there is strong evidence to suggest no binding contract exists for the purchase of the automobile. However, it’s important to note that legal interpretations can vary based on specific laws and additional details not mentioned in the scenario.

Recommendations for Jim and Laura:

It’s imperative for Jim and Laura to consult with a qualified lawyer for a more comprehensive assessment of their situation. They should provide the lawyer with all relevant details, including any additional conversations or agreements with Stan. Based on the lawyer’s analysis, they can determine their legal options and take necessary steps to protect their interests.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer