Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).
Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why?
Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking.
Non-consequentialism is a type of moral theory that holds that the rightness or wrongness of an action is not determined by its consequences. This means that some actions are right or wrong regardless of what outcomes they produce. There are many different versions of non-consequentialism, but some of the most common include deontology, which holds that the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by whether it conforms to a set of moral rules, and virtue ethics, which holds that the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by whether it is in accordance with the virtues of a good person.
It is important to note that there are many different types of moral reasoning, and these are just a few examples. Each type of moral reasoning has its own strengths and weaknesses, and it is up to each individual to decide which type of reasoning they find most persuasive.