Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches
Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).
Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why?
Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking.
Sample Answer
Consequentialism is a type of moral theory that holds that the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by its consequences. This means that if an action results in good outcomes, then it is morally right, and if it results in bad outcomes, then it is morally wrong. There are many different versions of consequentialism, but some of the most common include utilitarianism, which holds that the right action is the one that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people, and egoism, which holds that the right action is the one that produces the best outcome for the individual.