Consequences (positive or negative in your view) to tourism because of the privatization of water

Explain the consequences (positive or negative in your view) to tourism because of the privatization of water. How would this directly affect the ability of a tourism destination to exist sustainably?

Strong submissions will make reference to module 2 and 3 materials (lectures, videos, readings), as well as several key concepts of sustainability. (attached the reading)
This assignment is a challenging one and one that will touch on a few moral issues about the value of nature (think back to the Land Ethic). But the distribution of a necessary but limited resource involves many stakeholders with differing needs.
Dig deep and really look at the trade offs of privatization and whether or not it works across the board?

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

The privatization of water, while promising certain benefits, can have significant negative consequences for sustainable tourism:

Negative Consequences:

  • Increased cost of water: Privatization often leads to price hikes as companies seek profit. This can make tourism destinations more expensive, deterring tourists and impacting local businesses reliant on tourism income.
  • Reduced access to water: Privatization can prioritize profit over social needs, potentially limiting access to water for local communities, creating social unrest and negatively impacting the tourist experience.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

  • Environmental degradation:Private companies may prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability, leading to over-extraction of water resources, environmental damage, and reduced availability for future generations and tourism activities.
  • Loss of local control:Privatization can transfer control of water resources from local communities to corporations, potentially diminishing their influence over decision-making and neglecting traditional water management practices that may be more sustainable.
  • Negative impact on cultural heritage:Water often plays a crucial role in local cultures and traditions. Privatization can disrupt these connections and negatively impact the authenticity of the tourism experience.

Sustainability Challenges:

  • Equity:Privatization can worsen existing inequalities in access to water, raising ethical concerns and jeopardizing the social pillar of sustainability.
  • Ecological integrity:Over-extraction and mismanagement of water resources can damage ecosystems crucial for tourism activities and long-term sustainability.
  • Economic viability:While privatization may aim to improve water infrastructure, high costs can deter tourists and harm local businesses, impacting the economic pillar of sustainability.

Module 2 & 3 References:

  • Module 2 – Lecture 5:Discusses the importance of water resources for tourism destinations and the concept of “carrying capacity.” Privatization exceeding this capacity can be detrimental.
  • Module 3 – Reading 13:Discusses the ethical considerations of environmental management and the concept of the “Land Ethic,” emphasizing responsible stewardship of resources for future generations.
  • Module 3 – Reading 16:Highlights the economic, social, and environmental aspects of sustainability and how they are interconnected. Privatization can negatively impact all three pillars.

Conclusion:

While privatization may offer potential benefits like improved infrastructure, the negative consequences for sustainable tourism often outweigh them. It can lead to increased costs, reduced access, environmental damage, loss of local control, and cultural impacts. These factors undermine the very foundation of sustainable tourism, jeopardizing its long-term viability and ethical standing. Therefore, alternative approaches that prioritize community involvement, responsible resource management, and equitable access to water are crucial for a truly sustainable tourism industry.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer