Need help Comparing and Contrasting Freud & Erikson and Comparing and Contrasting Adler & Mahler.
What are some ways the Adlerian approach can be applied to group counseling? What are some advantages of using a group format with this approach?
Need help Comparing and Contrasting Freud & Erikson and Comparing and Contrasting Adler & Mahler.
What are some ways the Adlerian approach can be applied to group counseling? What are some advantages of using a group format with this approach?
Adler vs. Mahler:
| Feature | Adler | Mahler |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Striving for superiority, overcoming inferiority | Separation and individuation, development of self through interaction with caregiver |
| Motivation | Feelings of inferiority drive behavior | Need for connection and sense of self |
| Stages | Not strictly defined stages, emphasizes social tasks | Five stages: Autistic, Symbiotic, Separation-Individuation, Object Constancy |
Similarities
The Adlerian approach can be effectively applied in group counseling settings:
By utilizing group dynamics and fostering a safe and supportive environment, the Adlerian approach in group counseling can be a powerful tool for promoting personal growth and well-being.
Freud vs. Erikson:
| Feature | Freud | Erikson |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Unconscious mind, psychosexual stages (oral, anal, phallic, latency, genital) | Social interactions, psychosocial stages (trust vs. mistrust, autonomy vs. shame, initiative vs. guilt, industry vs. inferiority, identity vs. role confusion, intimacy vs. isolation, generativity vs. stagnation, ego integrity vs. despair) |
| Motivation | Libido (psychic energy) drives development | Balance between individual needs and social demands |
| Stages | Fixed order, unresolved conflicts impact later life | Stages build on each other, possibility for growth throughout life |
| View of Childhood | Crucial for personality development | Important, but later stages hold significance too |
Similarities