Compare And Contrast Metaethical Theories
Now that you have learned about competing ethical theories, write a thread that compares and contrasts a Christian ethical theory with a competing ethical theory. Since we have already looked at ethical relativism in Discussion: Relativism vs Absolutism, you may choose from any metaethical theory covered in Moral Choices or Talking About Ethics except ethical relativism. That means you can choose from Virtue Ethics, Natural Law, Ethical Egoism, Utilitarianism, and Duty Ethics in contrast to a Christian ethical theory.
How does each system define “the good?” How does each claim to know “the good?”
What, if anything, do these systems have in common? What, if anything, are their key differences?
Which theory do you think is the stronger ethical theory? Defend your answer. This final question should take up the majority of your thread.
Be sure to carefully define your terms, articulate the strengths and weaknesses of each theory, and defend your position. You are expected to support your position with rational arguments, fitting examples, and expert sources. Any quotes or information used from sources other than yourself must be cited using footnotes in current Turabian format and will not count towards the total word count.
Sample Answer
Christian ethics is a system of ethics based on the teachings of Christianity. It is based on the belief that there is an objective standard of good and evil, and that this standard is revealed in the Bible. Christian ethics also emphasizes the importance of love, compassion, and forgiveness.
Utilitarianism is a system of ethics that judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on its consequences. The most famous utilitarian philosopher is Jeremy Bentham, who argued that the right action is the one that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.